2005
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.9.4.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who wins and who loses: The rhetorical manipulation of social identities in a soccer team.

Abstract: This study describes the rhetorical manipulation of social identities arising in the discourses of a professional soccer team. The author audio recorded and completely transcribed according to G. Jefferson's (1989) method 3 discursive interactions between team members (after a victory, after a defeat, and in a pregame situation). Methodology comprises both a conversational analysis and a quantitative one. Results show that (a) team members use rhetorically a complex repertoire of their own and others' social i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zucchermaglio, 2005). In particular, it has been shown that the team's members made rhetorical use of a complex repertoire of their own and others' social identities, and that two main variables influenced the use of social identity markers: a) the role of the speakers (in particular the "power" role of the coach); b) the result of the match around which the interactive discourse revolved.…”
Section: Identity In Action: Groups Power and Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Zucchermaglio, 2005). In particular, it has been shown that the team's members made rhetorical use of a complex repertoire of their own and others' social identities, and that two main variables influenced the use of social identity markers: a) the role of the speakers (in particular the "power" role of the coach); b) the result of the match around which the interactive discourse revolved.…”
Section: Identity In Action: Groups Power and Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently evident in the discourses analyzed, especially during Meeting 2, are references to specific subgroups and sections of the broader team group (for detailed quantitative analysis of these phenomena see Zucchermaglio, 2005). As we have seen, the salience and relevance of these subgroups were functional to future game scenarios, especially but not solely for the manager.…”
Section: Who Are "We"?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is an example of how the discursive categories that "activate" particular configurations of group membership (Zucchermaglio, 2005;Edwards, 1998) in the discourse become strategies for coping with and mitigating fear and pain. Not being alone in the disease is described as a factor furnishing protection and potential emotional support.…”
Section: Extractmentioning
confidence: 99%