2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-brain Irradiation Field Design: A Comparison of Parotid Dose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent dosimetric studies in the era of 3-D planning (that makes possible the delineation and avoidance of organs at risk) report parotid doses of 15 to 20 Gy during WBRT, but these studies did not record clinical outcomes. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Therefore, the clinical significance of this parotid exposure is unknown, and the parotid glands are not routinely delineated or avoided during WBRT. 25,28 In contrast, radiation therapy for head and neck cancer is well known to be associated with substantial and sometimes permanent xerostomia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More recent dosimetric studies in the era of 3-D planning (that makes possible the delineation and avoidance of organs at risk) report parotid doses of 15 to 20 Gy during WBRT, but these studies did not record clinical outcomes. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Therefore, the clinical significance of this parotid exposure is unknown, and the parotid glands are not routinely delineated or avoided during WBRT. 25,28 In contrast, radiation therapy for head and neck cancer is well known to be associated with substantial and sometimes permanent xerostomia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1980, Cairncross et al described acute parotitis with accompanying hyperamylasemia in 4 patients. More recent dosimetric studies in the era of 3-D planning (that makes possible the delineation and avoidance of organs at risk) report parotid doses of 15 to 20 Gy during WBRT, but these studies did not record clinical outcomes . Therefore, the clinical significance of this parotid exposure is unknown, and the parotid glands are not routinely delineated or avoided during WBRT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard WBRT techniques have not changed appreciably for decades, and the routine practice of designing radiation fields to encompass the upper cervical vertebrae and the cribiform plate results in dose to the parotid and lacrimal glands, respectively. 8,[18][19][20][21] Figure 4A shows the radiation fields used to treat a study patient who developed persistent dry eye symptoms. In Figure 4B, the radiation fields were re-designed to spare the lacrimal glands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%