2017
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top087304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Cell Recording in the Awake Brain

Abstract: Intracellular recording is an essential technique for investigating cellular mechanisms underlying complex brain functions. Despite the high sensitivity of the technique to mechanical disturbances, intracellular recording has been applied to awake, behaving, and even freely moving, animals. Here we summarize recent advances in these methods and their application to the measurement and manipulation of membrane potential dynamics for understanding neuronal computations in behaving animals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study has some limitations. First, the recording time can be influenced by other factors (craniotomy quality (Lee et al, 2014 ), animal movement (Lee and Lee, 2017 ), brain pulsation (Levy et al, 2012 ), and cleanliness of the recording electrode (Hamill et al, 1981 ; Stett et al, 2003 ). These other factors cannot be controlled based on identical standards and may cause a biased result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study has some limitations. First, the recording time can be influenced by other factors (craniotomy quality (Lee et al, 2014 ), animal movement (Lee and Lee, 2017 ), brain pulsation (Levy et al, 2012 ), and cleanliness of the recording electrode (Hamill et al, 1981 ; Stett et al, 2003 ). These other factors cannot be controlled based on identical standards and may cause a biased result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate approach to address the limitation of head-fixed behaviors is to improve the head-mounted physiological recording systems compatible with free behavior. Progress is being made in miniaturizing recording devices for optical 53,54 , extracellular [55][56][57] or intracellular [58][59][60][61] recordings to make them compatible with free behavior. However, the need to miniaturize the devices leads to compromises in data throughput or quality.…”
Section: Figure 1 | Comparison Between Free Behaviors Virtual Realitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they have been extensively used for in vitro studies, their use in in vivo studies has been limited due to their large form factor. The conventional intracellular recording system has significant limitations: (1) owing to the large form factor of the technologies involved, recordings have mostly been obtained from anesthetized animals with the exception of a few studies 6,7 , (2) recordings are obtained from one neuron at a time (serial recording), (3) their use requires extraordinary manual skill and tedious operations, which results in a long training period for neurophysiologists, and (4) duration of recordings obtained are typically short (45-60 min in anesthetized animals, 5-30 min in awake head-fixed animals 8,9 ), often due to mechanical disruptions at the electrode-cell interface. These challenges have impeded chronic intracellular recording studies from a population of neurons in anesthetized and awake animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%