2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.798607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole Exome Sequencing in 16p13.11 Microdeletion Patients Reveals New Variants Through Deductive and Systems Medicine Approaches

Abstract: The 16p13.11 microdeletion, whose prevalence in the general population is about 0.04%, is known in literature as a predisposition factor to neurodevelopmental disorders, being found in about 0.13% of patients with schizophrenia, in 0.5–0.6% of patient with epilepsy, cognitive impairment, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and aggressiveness. The goal of this study was to identify a specific gene set pattern unique for the affected patients in comparison with other familial components. Due to the incomplete penetra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the clinical practice, CMA technology manifests a great advantage in copy number variants (CNVs) detection, as well as uniparental diploid and triploid, and it has been recommended as a first-line detection tool in etiological diagnosis of patients with multiple congenital anomalies [ 26 , 27 ]. In addition, WES technology has been recommended as a fundamental tool to investigate additional sequence variants in patient with normal CMA result or unexplained CNVs [ 28 , 29 ]. In the present study, we present a Chinese pediatric patient with global developmental delay, speech delay, severe intellectual disability, and seizures and had a de novo PAK1 gene variant associated with a de novo terminal 1q44 microdeletion, without covering the reported three distinct SRO in 1q43q44 microdeletion region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical practice, CMA technology manifests a great advantage in copy number variants (CNVs) detection, as well as uniparental diploid and triploid, and it has been recommended as a first-line detection tool in etiological diagnosis of patients with multiple congenital anomalies [ 26 , 27 ]. In addition, WES technology has been recommended as a fundamental tool to investigate additional sequence variants in patient with normal CMA result or unexplained CNVs [ 28 , 29 ]. In the present study, we present a Chinese pediatric patient with global developmental delay, speech delay, severe intellectual disability, and seizures and had a de novo PAK1 gene variant associated with a de novo terminal 1q44 microdeletion, without covering the reported three distinct SRO in 1q43q44 microdeletion region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent findings, however, some genes are suspected to be involved in the disease process. 26 27 28 Microtia often leads to hearing impairment or complete deafness in the affected ear due to the structural abnormalities of the ear canal and middle ear. Surgical procedures, such as ear reconstruction or the use of hearing aids, are commonly employed to address the functional and cosmetic aspects of microtia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large deletions (> 100 Kb) at 16p13.11 were observed in 23 patients, whereas in the control group, no deletions more than 16 Kb were found. Recently, Granata et al 27 reported on three distinct families in which two individuals were affected by inherited deletion in 16p13.11 and 16p13.11p12.3, respectively, and another third had a de novo 16p13.11 microdeletion. All four patients showed variable degrees of ID; two of them were also affected by language delay and dysmorphism, while in a single case was observed cryptorchidism and in another one stereotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional mutations besides the structural variants were identified by WES detection in patients with familial 1q21.1 microduplication/microdeletion, duplication of Xp22.31, and 16p11.2 duplication who exhibited phenotypical variability ( Dastan et al, 2016 ; Qiao et al, 2017 ; Qiao et al, 2019 ). In addition, a recent study conducted by Granata et al (2022 ) identified variants in CECR2 , MTOR , RICTOR, and LRRK2 genes by WES detection in the affected patients who also had a 16p13.11 microdeletion and proposed that WES technology could be used as a fundamental tool to identify additional mutations in patients with a predisposing variant. In this study, the WES technology was employed to further investigate the genetic etiology in a fetus with familial 2q14.2 duplication who had more severe phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%