“…These display contrasting phenotyping attributes comprise 10% of the population and have predominance of either of dosha s. Prakriti of individuals is assessed using a compendium of composite phenotypes that encompass anatomical, physiological, response, and activity-associated attributes. Nearly two decades of exploratory research carried out by different groups have provided molecular correlates of Prakriti from different functional hierarchies – phenomic, genetic, genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, metagenomic as well as at biochemical, immunological, and cellular levels, and most recently, at the physiological level (Bhushan et al, 2005 ; Prasher et al, 2008 ; Aggarwal et al, 2010 , 2015 ; Joshi et al, 2011 ; Rotti et al, 2014 , 2015 ; Satyamoorthy et al, 2014 ; Govindaraj et al, 2015 ; Tiwari et al, 2017 ; Chauhan et al, 2018 ; Chaudhari et al, 2019 ; Abbas et al, 2020 , 2022 ; Mobeen et al, 2020 ; Chakraborty et al, 2021 ; Shalini et al, 2021 ; Rani et al, 2022 ). These studies have been primarily conducted on healthy individuals of extreme and contrasting constitution types that are most easily discernible at the level of composite phenotypes, and who also have contrasting responses and vulnerability (Prasher et al, 2017 ).…”