2019
DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-exome sequencing in multiplex preeclampsia families identifies novel candidate susceptibility genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently showed that the fetal genome contains a preeclampsia susceptibility locus at FLT1 6 . However, previous attempts to identify maternal sequence variants associated with preeclampsia through genome-wide association scans (GWAS) or targeted gene-centric analysis have been hampered by small sample size [7][8][9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently showed that the fetal genome contains a preeclampsia susceptibility locus at FLT1 6 . However, previous attempts to identify maternal sequence variants associated with preeclampsia through genome-wide association scans (GWAS) or targeted gene-centric analysis have been hampered by small sample size [7][8][9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several sequencing efforts, including whole genome, whole exome and targeted sequencing, on an array of preeclampsia phenotypes from diverse populations ( Johnson et al, 2012 ; Emmery et al, 2016 ; Kaartokallio et al, 2016 ; Thomsen et al, 2017 ; Gammill et al, 2018 ; Hansen et al, 2018 ; Soellner et al, 2018 ; Glotov et al, 2019 ; Melton et al, 2019 ; Steinthorsdottir et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ). There is no consensus among the published results in regards to associated genes and variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several sequencing efforts including whole genome, whole exome and targeted sequencing on an array of preeclampsia phenotypes from diverse populations 37,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] . There is no consensus among the published results in regards to associated genes and variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%