2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole exome sequencing of families with 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication

Abstract: Recurrent microduplications/microdeletions of 1q21.1 are characterized by variable phenotypes ranging from normal development to developmental delay (DD) and congenital anomalies. Their interpretation is challenging especially in families with affected and unaffected carriers. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) to look for sequence variants in two male probands with inherited 1q21.1 CNVs that could explain their more severe phenotypes. One proband had a 1q21.1 deletion transmitted from maternal grandmother, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from prior studies (Girirajan et al, 2010, 2012) suggest that the 1q21.1 microdeletion is a risk factor for neuropsychiatric phenotypes and congenital anomalies and that expression and penetrance of the variant may be influenced by additional genetic factors. Limited studies have investigated how variants throughout the genome may impact expression of the distal 1q21.1 deletion (Mefford et al, 2008; Qiao et al, 2017). Genome‐level analysis among carriers of the deletion is warranted to further delineate how genomic variation may impact the expression of the distal 1q21.1 deletion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from prior studies (Girirajan et al, 2010, 2012) suggest that the 1q21.1 microdeletion is a risk factor for neuropsychiatric phenotypes and congenital anomalies and that expression and penetrance of the variant may be influenced by additional genetic factors. Limited studies have investigated how variants throughout the genome may impact expression of the distal 1q21.1 deletion (Mefford et al, 2008; Qiao et al, 2017). Genome‐level analysis among carriers of the deletion is warranted to further delineate how genomic variation may impact the expression of the distal 1q21.1 deletion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no explanation as to why the same position and CNV would result in a different phenotype[ 19 ]. Genes are epigenetically inherited and subject to environmental modifications; genetic alterations may make CNV carriers more susceptible to environmental influences, which can lead to different phenotypes, depending on the severity of the environmental impact[ 20 , 21 ]. Furthermore, the variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance suggest that the influence of CNV is modified by other genetic loci or environmental factors[ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WES technology showed a great effectiveness in genetic etiology diagnosis in patients at the single-gene level, while few studies were available to further reveal the phenotypical diversity of unexplained structure variants using WES technology. Additional mutations besides the structural variants were identified by WES detection in patients with familial 1q21.1 microduplication/microdeletion, duplication of Xp22.31, and 16p11.2 duplication who exhibited phenotypical variability ( Dastan et al, 2016 ; Qiao et al, 2017 ; Qiao et al, 2019 ). In addition, a recent study conducted by Granata et al (2022 ) identified variants in CECR2 , MTOR , RICTOR, and LRRK2 genes by WES detection in the affected patients who also had a 16p13.11 microdeletion and proposed that WES technology could be used as a fundamental tool to identify additional mutations in patients with a predisposing variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%