2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole genome expression profiling of advance stage papillary serous ovarian cancer reveals activated pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the ability of ET-1 to control the tumor-host interactions (6,(9)(10)(11), underlines its key role allowing close coordination in the cellular signaling network in ovarian cancer growth and progression. These findings complement and extend the analysis of gene expression profile of late-stage ovarian cancer whereby ET A R has been identified as a metastasis-associated gene (12). To characterize downstream mediators in ET-1-induced ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis, we focused on the role of ␤-arrestins, as scaffold proteins of GPCR, in the ␤-catenin signaling pathway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this context, the ability of ET-1 to control the tumor-host interactions (6,(9)(10)(11), underlines its key role allowing close coordination in the cellular signaling network in ovarian cancer growth and progression. These findings complement and extend the analysis of gene expression profile of late-stage ovarian cancer whereby ET A R has been identified as a metastasis-associated gene (12). To characterize downstream mediators in ET-1-induced ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis, we focused on the role of ␤-arrestins, as scaffold proteins of GPCR, in the ␤-catenin signaling pathway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4 Because inhibition of cell growth could also be due to the induction of apoptosis induced by ZD4054 or taxol, we therefore investigated whether ZD4054 could potentiate the effect of paclitaxel by inducing apoptosis compared with either single agent. ET A R activation by ET-1 triggers multiple signal transduction pathways that include MAPK and AKT pathways (8,15). In particular, we previously demonstrated that PI3K-dependent Akt pathway has a central role in ET A R-mediated protection against paclitaxeldependent apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells (16).…”
Section: Cell Proliferation Inhibition By Zd4054 and Paclitaxelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major receptor subtypes that mediate ET's biological effects belong to the G-protein coupled receptor family: the ET A receptor (ET A R) is considered as the major effector of the ET axis and binds ET-1 and ET-2 with high affinity and ET-3 with low affinity; whereas the ET B R binds all ET isopeptides with the equal affinity (7). Interestingly, in gene expression profiles of latestage ovarian cancer, ET A R was identified as a metastasisassociated gene that activates cell signaling involved in the control of cell migration, spread, and invasion (8,9). Levels of ET-1 are markedly elevated in the ascites of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (10) and, together with the ET A R, are overexpressed and activated in 85% of ovarian tumors, correlating with advanced stages (7,11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promising results have been reported in several cancers, including bladder, colon and breast cancers (Neibergs et al, 2002;van't Veer et al, 2002;Dyrskjot et al, 2003), of gene expression profiling as a new means for identifying diagnostic and prognostic targets. While this approach has been applied to ovarian cancer (Adib et al, 2004;Donninger et al, 2004;Hibbs et al, 2004;Lancaster et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2004;Lu et al, 2004;Santin et al, 2004;Warrenfeltz et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2005), resulting in the identification of several hundred genes differentially expressed between NOSE (normal ovarian surface epithelia) and EOC, less than 10% of these genes were identified in common by at least two reports (Le Page et al, 2004). Although sample size, methods of evaluation and expression platforms vary and could account for differences in gene expression profiles, additional independent studies are required for cross-comparison to identify reliable gene markers that vary in expression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%