2015
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsv011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-genome resequencing analyses of five pig breeds, including Korean wild and native, and three European origin breeds

Abstract: Pigs have been one of the most important sources of meat for humans, and their productivity has been substantially improved by recent strong selection. Here, we present whole-genome resequencing analyses of 55 pigs of five breeds representing Korean native pigs, wild boar and three European origin breeds. 1,673.1 Gb of sequence reads were mapped to the Swine reference assembly, covering ∼99.2% of the reference genome, at an average of ∼11.7-fold coverage. We detected 20,123,573 single-nucleotide polymorphisms … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(40 reference statements)
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test whether the recovered genes missing in the reference genome were under selection, we retrieved ∼365.55 Gb orphan reads against the reference genome from 117 publicly available pig genomes (Ai et al 2015;Choi et al 2015;Moon et al 2015) and aligned them to the intact scaffolds harboring missing genes across the 10 breed assemblies (∼636.38 Mb per assembly) (Supplemental Fig. S41).…”
Section: Detecting Coding Snps In Missing Genes Under Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To test whether the recovered genes missing in the reference genome were under selection, we retrieved ∼365.55 Gb orphan reads against the reference genome from 117 publicly available pig genomes (Ai et al 2015;Choi et al 2015;Moon et al 2015) and aligned them to the intact scaffolds harboring missing genes across the 10 breed assemblies (∼636.38 Mb per assembly) (Supplemental Fig. S41).…”
Section: Detecting Coding Snps In Missing Genes Under Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S42). The remaining 70 individuals (including 10 Korean wild boars and 60 European/North American domestic pigs) with intermediate coverage (15.87× of the reference genome, 6.99× of missing gene embedded scaffolds by 2.60 Gb orphan reads per individual) (Choi et al 2015;Moon et al 2015) were used to investigate the patterns of selected loci (Supplemental Fig. S41).…”
Section: Detecting Coding Snps In Missing Genes Under Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We downloaded 107 public pig sequences from the short-read archive, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra (Groenen et al 2012;Molnár et al 2014;Ai et al 2015;Bianco et al 2015a;Choi et al 2015), pertaining to 32 Large White (LW), 19 Landrace (LR), 14 Pietrain (PI), 27 Duroc (DU), and 15 Meishan (MS) pigs. Alignment was carried out with BWA (Li and Durbin 2009), PCR duplicates were removed with samtools, and bam files were then realigned around indels with GATK IndelRealigner tool (McKenna et al 2010).…”
Section: Sequence Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected SNPs from 287 pigs, and 6 related species, published in several studies (8, 13, 14, 20, 21) or generated by our laboratory. These samples originated mainly from Eurasia and represent both domestication locations of the pig (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%