2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) fails to detect antimicrobial resistance (AMR) from heteroresistant subpopulation of Salmonella enterica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one S. Cerro isolate (BOV_CERO_35_10-02-08_R8-2685) was reported to be phenotypically resistant to nine antimicrobials but did not possess any acquired AMR determinants known to produce this phenotypic AMR profile. A recent case study in which WGS and phenotypic methods were used to characterize Salmonella isolates from raw chicken identified numerous AMR genotype/phenotype discrepancies resulting in both false negative and false positive predictions for in silico methods This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article (Zwe et al, 2020). In this case study, the authors attributed these discrepancies to heteroresistant Salmonella subpopulations (i.e., a subpopulation of bacteria that exhibits a range of susceptibility to a particular antimicrobial).…”
Section: Limitations Of the In Silico Amr Methods Evaluation Presented Here And Considerations For Future Amr Monitoring Efforts Among LImentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, one S. Cerro isolate (BOV_CERO_35_10-02-08_R8-2685) was reported to be phenotypically resistant to nine antimicrobials but did not possess any acquired AMR determinants known to produce this phenotypic AMR profile. A recent case study in which WGS and phenotypic methods were used to characterize Salmonella isolates from raw chicken identified numerous AMR genotype/phenotype discrepancies resulting in both false negative and false positive predictions for in silico methods This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article (Zwe et al, 2020). In this case study, the authors attributed these discrepancies to heteroresistant Salmonella subpopulations (i.e., a subpopulation of bacteria that exhibits a range of susceptibility to a particular antimicrobial).…”
Section: Limitations Of the In Silico Amr Methods Evaluation Presented Here And Considerations For Future Amr Monitoring Efforts Among LImentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Yet a gold standard remains out of reach due to discrepancies. A major source of these discrepancies is hetero-resistant Salmonella, which cannot be predicted for using current WGS software [51]. Thus, no primary diagnostic tool (including WGS) currently exists for MDR Salmonella, although recent improvements in automated precommercialized SIR technologies (FASTinov ® ) could lead to better predictive accuracies in the future [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon exclusion of the VME rates for streptomycin and sulfamethoxazole, said values increased to 0.89 and 0.97. Notably, the WGS-based genotyping methods used in the study did not account for attenuation mechanisms or reliably predict for underlying temporary genetic features (tandem repeats) present in subpopulations (heteroresistance) during phenotypic testing [51].…”
Section: Automated Whole Genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one S. Cerro isolate (BOV_CERO_35_10-02-08_R8-2685) was reported to be phenotypically resistant to nine antimicrobials but did not possess any acquired AMR determinants known to produce this phenotypic AMR profile. A recent case study in which WGS and phenotypic methods were used to characterize Salmonella isolates from raw chicken identified numerous AMR genotype/phenotype discrepancies resulting in both false negative and false positive predictions for in silico methods ( Zwe et al, 2020 ). In this case study, the authors attributed these discrepancies to heteroresistant Salmonella subpopulations (i.e., a subpopulation of bacteria that exhibits a range of susceptibility to a particular antimicrobial).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%