2018
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole human heart histology to validate electroanatomical voltage mapping in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia

Abstract: Considering the linear relationships between WT, amount of fibrosis and both UV and BV, the search for any distinct voltage cut-off to identify fibrosis in NICM is futile. The amount of fibrosis can be calculated, if WT and voltages are known. Fibrosis pattern and architecture are different from ischaemic cardiomyopathy and findings on ischaemic substrates may not be applicable to NICM.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
90
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, significant overlap in voltage amplitudes between scar and normal myocardium and substantial inter-patient differences [3][4][5] limit the validity of distinct voltage cut-off values to identify scar. 6 These data suggest that additional factors may affect the voltage amplitudes. 7 Substantial differences in characterization of scar by low-voltage areas between intrinsic rhythm and ventricular pacing were recently reported, 8 indicating that the activation sequence influences voltage amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, significant overlap in voltage amplitudes between scar and normal myocardium and substantial inter-patient differences [3][4][5] limit the validity of distinct voltage cut-off values to identify scar. 6 These data suggest that additional factors may affect the voltage amplitudes. 7 Substantial differences in characterization of scar by low-voltage areas between intrinsic rhythm and ventricular pacing were recently reported, 8 indicating that the activation sequence influences voltage amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As will be discussed, additional work has prospectively validated the use of the less than 8.3 mV UNIP voltage cutoff in the LV as a reference to define a high likelihood of diseased intramural and epi myocardium and guide VT ablation procedures, to predict an unfavorable clinical outcome of the nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ICM and to identify irreversibility of PVC-induced LV cardiomyopathy. 20,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34] A similar methodology based on determination of the fifth percentile of the distribution of UNIP voltage values in normal individuals was used for the right ventricle (RV) free wall, with a less than 5.5 mV reference F I G U R E 2 Influence of high-pass filtering on unipolar electrogram configuration. Bipolar (Bi 1-2) and unipolar (Uni) recordings are registered from electrodes 1 to 2 during ventricular tachycardia mapping.…”
Section: Defining Normal Unip Voltage Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater wall thickness as such occurs when LV hypertrophy increases the cutoff value for "normal" endo UNIP voltage. 17,29 On the basis of our experience, in the presence of LV wall thickening (hypertrophic/ hypertensive cardiomyopathies) and/or regional increments in the wall thickness as noted in some other NICMs, we recommend increasing the endo UNIP voltage reference for defining normal by adjusting the voltage slider bar in 0.5 mV increments up to 10 or 11 mV and determining if a single area of lower voltage can be identified suggesting scar at a distance from the endo ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Endocardial Unip Signals To Identify Abnormal Bp Voltage Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both fibrosis density and type played a role in the possibility of generating a reentry in our model NIDCM geometry. This is significant because detailed quantification of the absolute type and level of fibrosis in LGE images in NIDCM patients is currently not possible, due to the lack of comparison between core scar and remote tissue, as is commonly used in assessing infarct fibrotic density in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%