2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0698-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole muscle contractile parameters and thickness loss during 35-day bed rest

Abstract: Extended exposure to microgravity leads to significant musculoskeletal adaptations. Contractile parameters of four skeletal muscles (biceps brachii-BB, vastus medialis-VM, biceps femoris-BF and gastrocnemius medialis-GM) were measured in ten healthy males (aged 22.3 +/- 2.2 years) during 35 days of horizontal bed rest by a mechanomyography-based method termed 'tensiomyography' (TMG). Two contractile parameters: contraction time (Tc) and maximal displacement (Dm) were individually measured from electrically evo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

17
177
4
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
17
177
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Lo anterior se respalda por Pisot et al, (2008), quienes rescatan que los efectos del reposo posterior a 35 días en cama producen un aumento del Dm y un aumento del Tc. Asimismo, la respuesta a la fatiga muestra un comportamiento similar, inmediatamente posterior a la participación de los atletas en una ultratriatlón (García-Manso et al, 2011), lo cual refleja un aumento de los valores de Dm y Tc para bíceps femoral, pero nuevamente no se muestran valores 24 horas posteriores a la actividad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lo anterior se respalda por Pisot et al, (2008), quienes rescatan que los efectos del reposo posterior a 35 días en cama producen un aumento del Dm y un aumento del Tc. Asimismo, la respuesta a la fatiga muestra un comportamiento similar, inmediatamente posterior a la participación de los atletas en una ultratriatlón (García-Manso et al, 2011), lo cual refleja un aumento de los valores de Dm y Tc para bíceps femoral, pero nuevamente no se muestran valores 24 horas posteriores a la actividad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Por consiguiente, basado en los anterior se debe señalar que el J4 tuvo una particularidad con respecto a la LB, J1, J2 y J3, esto se podría explicar basándose en lo descrito por Rusu et al, (2013), quien indica que hay una respuesta aguda al entrenamiento en un lapso de 22 días de ejercicio físico contra resistencia, similar al tiempo en que transcurrieron las mediciones del presente estudio (24 días), hubo una disminución del Tc y un aumento del Dm. Las respuestas neuromusculares mencionadas anteriormente son respuestas contrarias a las señaladas por Pisot et al, (2008) (aumento de Tc y de Dm como respuesta al reposo prolongado), García-Manso et al, (2011) (aumento de Tc y Dm como respuesta inmediata a un evento de resistencia), (aumento del Tc y Dm 24 horas posterior a un maratón).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…From all TMG parameters, Dm, Ts and Tr seem to provide the most useful information in evaluation of muscle fatigue (Krizaj et al, 2008). Dm, which could be equated to electrically evoked peak twitch torque, is determined by both the number and the type of muscle fibers recruited by the electrical stimulus, being considered as a measure of muscle belly stiffness (Pisot et al, 2008). In the present study TMG analysis of RF of right leg was performed before (pre-test) and after intense exercise (post-test), reported significant decreases in Dm and Td values, although no statistical differences were observed when Tr and Ts assessed in pre-test and posttest were compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, measurements of contraction time by TMG have been successfully implemented on different muscle groups (Valencic and Knez, 1997) to investigate endurance and muscle belly stiffness among other muscular responses (Grabljevec et al, 2005;Pisot et al, 2008). However, muscle contractile properties during or after fatiguing exercise remains unclear (Letafatkar et al, 2009;Hosseinimehr et al, 2010) mainly due to a lack of adequate assay system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRE provides a direct quantitative measure of muscle belly stiffness by measurement of the complex shear modulus. Direct measurement of the muscle belly stiffness removes contributions from sources other than the muscle group in question, e.g., synergists and antagonist muscle groups, skin, ligaments, tendons, and articular structures,29 which may be a factor in other methodologies used to indirectly measure muscle stiffness such as range of motion analysis30 and tensiomyography (TMG) 31. MRE has previously been applied to muscle by Dresner et al,32 who showed that muscle stiffness increased with applied load, and Klatt et al,33 who showed that muscle stiffness increases linearly with strength of contraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%