2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-Ranch Unit Analysis of Multipaddock Grazing on Rangeland Sustainability in North Central Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to year-long (or growing season) continuous grazing, rotational grazing has been recommended as an effective tool to maximize livestock production and maintain sustainability of the operations since the mid-20th century [5][6][7][8][9]. However, there has been a long history of debate over continuous versus rotational grazing by both rangeland managers and research scientists across the world that is yet not resolved [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to year-long (or growing season) continuous grazing, rotational grazing has been recommended as an effective tool to maximize livestock production and maintain sustainability of the operations since the mid-20th century [5][6][7][8][9]. However, there has been a long history of debate over continuous versus rotational grazing by both rangeland managers and research scientists across the world that is yet not resolved [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses of vegetation to continuous and rotational grazing are usually examined from the perspectives of vegetation canopy structure, species composition, primary productivity, and forage quality using field survey data [14][15][16]18,23,29,30,[32][33][34]. Field data collection is time-consuming and labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two potential explanations for the inconsistency between expected and empirically assessed outcomes. First, until very recently [16,17], few studies evaluated the ecological outcomes of actual management decisions at a management-relevant scale-the ranch or pastoral grazing territory. Second, existing studies conducted at a management scale do not isolate the effects of specific practices [18,19], but rather evaluate the aggregate effects of the whole suite of practices implemented on a particular ranch on multiple indicators (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, adjustments to grazing are often limited because of complex environments, such as soil and water resources, nutrient and weather conditions [16,17]. The relevance of broad-spectrum studies conducted by researchers do not reflect a broad understanding of the ranchers' perspectives regarding the efficacy of alternative grazing systems [18] and their rigid treatment structure could omit the adaptive nature of management commonly found on grazing lands at which livestock production occurs [14l, leading to inconsistencies in the outcome of these management investigations. Moreover, the vast majority of research experiments are performed separately in isolation, and thereby lack the systematic connection necessary to reach a consensus of scaling-up strategies due to the inconsistence and very limited context data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the vast majority of research experiments are performed separately in isolation, and thereby lack the systematic connection necessary to reach a consensus of scaling-up strategies due to the inconsistence and very limited context data. This is in part due to limitations of narrowly imposed experimental grazing research due to different soil, landscape and climate conditions and in part resultant knowledge transfer between researchers and ranchers [14,18,19]. Some studies found that even at low stocking rates, animal preferences lead to patch-selected overgrazing due to inadequate recovery of the palatable species [20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%