Whole-system approaches to improving the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers: A systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare professionals throughout the developed world report higher levels of sickness absence, dissatisfaction, distress, and “burnout” at work than staff in other sectors. There is a growing call for the ‘triple aim’ of healthcare delivery (improving patient experience and outcomes and reducing costs; to include a fourth aim: improving healthcare staff experience of healthcare delivery. A systematic review commissioned by the United Kingdom’s (UK) Department of Health reviewed a large number of international healthy workplace interventions and recommended five whole-system changes to improve healthcare staff health and wellbeing: identification and response to local need, engagement of staff at all levels, and the involvement, visible leadership from, and up-skilling of, management and board-level staff.ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to identify whole-system healthy workplace interventions in healthcare settings that incorporate (combinations of) these recommendations and determine whether they improve staff health and wellbeing.MethodsA comprehensive and systematic search of medical, education, exercise science, and social science databases was undertaken. Studies were included if they reported the results of interventions that included all healthcare staff within a healthcare setting (e.g. whole hospital; whole unit, e.g. ward) in collective activities to improve physical or mental health or promote healthy behaviours.ResultsEleven studies were identified which incorporated at least one of the whole-system recommendations. Interventions that incorporated recommendations to address local need and engage the whole workforce fell in to four broad types: 1) pre-determined (one-size-fits-all) and no choice of activities (two studies); or 2) pre-determined and some choice of activities (one study); 3) A wide choice of a range of activities and some adaptation to local needs (five studies); or, 3) a participatory approach to creating programmes responsive and adaptive to local staff needs that have extensive choice of activities to participate in (three studies). Only five of the interventions included substantial involvement and engagement of leadership and efforts aimed at up-skilling the leadership of staff to support staff health and wellbeing. Incorporation of more of the recommendations did not appear to be related to effectiveness. The heterogeneity of study designs, populations and outcomes excluded a meta-analysis. All studies were deemed by their authors to be at least partly effective. Two studies reported statistically significant improvement in objectively measured physical health (BMI) and eight in subjective mental health. Six studies reported statistically significant positive changes in subjectively assessed health behaviours.ConclusionsThis systematic review identified 11 studies which incorporate at least one of the Boorman recommendations and provides evidence that whole-system healthy workplace interventions can improve health and wellbeing and promote healthier behaviours in ...

Evaluation of a leadership development program to enhance university staff and student resilience

“…While no direct correlations were drawn in the study based on gender, it is worth noting that 83% of respondents were female. In addition, the majority of staff were from health-related courses, a field with a high representation of females and major concerns about staff and student wellbeing (Brand et al, 2017).…”

The Perioperative Nurse Surgical Assitant (PNSA) of the future

“…The NMSA role can also prove to be costeffective by decreasing preparation time for surgery and shortening actual operation time 7 . PNSAs are valued by other perioperative nurses due to a focus on improved worklife balance and working conditions, mentoring and leadership; surgeons also acknowledge their contribution to quality of care and efficiency 3,10,22,23 .…”

Closing the gaps in defining and conceptualising acceptability of healthcare: A synthesis review and thematic content analysis

“…From the healthcare perspective, dependent variables would include components characterising provider, healthcare and community acceptability from a health systems and policy standpoint. Components characterising provider acceptability would be any information referring to enthusiasm and motivation of healthcare staff to specific healthcare delivery or policy implementation [29]. Components describing healthcare acceptability would be any information related to feasibility and success of specific health priorities and strategic plans as well as associated costeffectiveness within lager integrated health systems [30].…”