2008
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wholly endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm

Abstract: Wholly endovascular TAAA repair is relatively safe, but long-term follow-up is required to establish its durability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6,11,[14][15][16] We intensively monitor the MAP and intervene as necessary to maintain values Ͼ90 mm Hg. We also intervene to maintain a urine output of Ͼ60 mL/h and a central venous pressure of Ͻ15 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,11,[14][15][16] We intensively monitor the MAP and intervene as necessary to maintain values Ͼ90 mm Hg. We also intervene to maintain a urine output of Ͼ60 mL/h and a central venous pressure of Ͻ15 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-branched endovascular TAAA repair has already been described in articles spanning almost a decade. 1,2,4,5 However, some aspects of stent graft design and implantation, relating to the causes and effects of branch misalignment, deserve emphasis here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Until recently, all branched stent grafts were custom-made to reflect individual patient anatomy. However, customization, and the attendant delay in therapy, may not be necessary in every case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports combine the results of patients treated with fenestrated devices and those treated with branched devices, 6-10 and many patients are treated with devices that combine fenestrations and branches. [8][9][10]17,20 In addition, the branch structure used in the treatment of TAAA (caudally directed vs cranially directed, radial vs spiral vs axial orientation) varies within and between reports. As a consequence, assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each technique and comparing a specific endovascular technique vs conventional open TAAA repair and hybrid TAAA repair remains difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%