2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2203589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Whose Choice are We Talking About? The Exclusion of Students with Disabilities from For-Profit Online Charter Schools'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the biggest challenge is how to manage the influx of online learning opportunities to ensure that students (regardless of race/ethnicity, gender, age, social class, language origin, and handicapping condition) get their full benefit and not end up lost in cyberspace. Challengers argue that public funding of online schooling will create greater inequities for students with greater needs (Bernstein, 2013). Critics also claim that 'creaming' (selection mechanism) of online students may occur through targeted recruitment (DeJarnatt, 2013).…”
Section: A Typology Of Online Schooling: Virtual and Blended Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the biggest challenge is how to manage the influx of online learning opportunities to ensure that students (regardless of race/ethnicity, gender, age, social class, language origin, and handicapping condition) get their full benefit and not end up lost in cyberspace. Challengers argue that public funding of online schooling will create greater inequities for students with greater needs (Bernstein, 2013). Critics also claim that 'creaming' (selection mechanism) of online students may occur through targeted recruitment (DeJarnatt, 2013).…”
Section: A Typology Of Online Schooling: Virtual and Blended Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During these times, students may not have had optimal access to the curriculum. Even so, these teachers did not suppose or suggest service plans had too many services or accommodations for students, which has been a concern in pre-pandemic fully online learning (Bernstein, 2012 ; Ortiz et al, 2021 ). Instead, the teachers drew on their commitments to inclusion and advocated for students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported positive outcomes include an increased sense of belonging and increased opportunities for parental control over educational experiences. Other scholars, such as Bernstein ( 2012 ) have raised concerns about whether services guaranteed under IDEA ( 2004 ) are being provided as required. Research by Basham et al ( 2015 ) and Ortiz et al ( 2021 ) has suggested that there is a risk of losing articulated services with no replacements in the online setting.…”
Section: Teachers’ Use Of Technologies To Support Students With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%