2015
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1115722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose preferences should be elicited for use in health-care decision-making? A case study using anticoagulant therapy

Abstract: The question of whose preferences to elicit in health-state valuation has been widely discussed in the literature. The importance of this debate lies in the fact that health-state utility values are used in health technology assessment (HTA); therefore, an individual's preferences can influence decision-making. If preferences differ across groups, making decisions based on one group's preferences may be suboptimal for the other. Preferences for benefits, risks, experiences and health states associated with ant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and I said, "No, I get up, have my cup of tea then 8, half past 8 do it." 78 other systematic reviews on similar topics [84][85][86][87] to identify potentially missed relevant studies. Additionally, although we included quantitative and qualitative studies, the search strategy may not have been sensitive enough to ensure the identification of the full body of qualitative evidence, and the inclusion of these types of studies could be considered unsystematic.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and I said, "No, I get up, have my cup of tea then 8, half past 8 do it." 78 other systematic reviews on similar topics [84][85][86][87] to identify potentially missed relevant studies. Additionally, although we included quantitative and qualitative studies, the search strategy may not have been sensitive enough to ensure the identification of the full body of qualitative evidence, and the inclusion of these types of studies could be considered unsystematic.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are well known arguments against the use of patient preferences with respect to health state valuation [30], and some of these arguments can be applied to other types of preference studies [31]. HTAs assess whether an intervention should be financed.…”
Section: Normative Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Should it be the general population, whose resources are being allocated (and whose values are used for the EQ-5D-3L), or patients who have experience of the disease? If preferences differ across groups, making decisions based on one group's preferences may be suboptimal for the other.…”
Section: Stage 3: Respondent Recruitment and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%