2005
DOI: 10.1080/10439460500168576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose Streets? Police and Protester Struggles over Space in Washington, DC, 29–30 September 2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To do so, she may use a variety of non‐military methods, including negotiating with protest leaders, communicating directly with the protesters using a sound system, and blocking street segments. These measures are similar to those used by other democratic police agencies (e.g., Button et al ; Gorringe et al ; Noakes et al ; Rafail et al ). Depending on the number of protesters, preliminary risk assessments, and the resources available to the district, the event commander may also call for the help of national PPUs (see below).…”
Section: Study Contextmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To do so, she may use a variety of non‐military methods, including negotiating with protest leaders, communicating directly with the protesters using a sound system, and blocking street segments. These measures are similar to those used by other democratic police agencies (e.g., Button et al ; Gorringe et al ; Noakes et al ; Rafail et al ). Depending on the number of protesters, preliminary risk assessments, and the resources available to the district, the event commander may also call for the help of national PPUs (see below).…”
Section: Study Contextmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Required permits facilitated the collection of information about protesters and planned events by the police, opened lines of communication with protest groups and helped police avoid on and in the job troubles like excessive force, brutality, burnout and high profile investigations of police conduct (Waddington 1994). It also reduced conflicts between police and protesters by making each better known and more predictable to the other (Noakes et al 2005, Noakes and Gillham 2006, Gillham and Noakes 2007, Gillham 2011 P.F. Gillham et al…”
Section: Repertoires Of Protest Controlmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even the bronze bull, long a symbol of finance capitalism was protected against symbolic repurposing, vandalism or worse by barricades and a 24-h security detail. Hard zone borders are frequently sites of contention (Noakes et al 2005), and controlling them is a key tactic in police efforts to exert spatial control over public protest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But what is also noticeable about these police and legal tactics in public space is that they often assume different degrees of coercion even in the same place of dissent depending on whether the authorities perceive protestors as engaging in non‐resistance dissent or resistance dissent. An illustration of this point can be gained from a study of anti‐war protests on 29–30 September 2001 in Washington, DC, by Noakes et al. (2005).…”
Section: Zones Law and Dissentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Noakes et al. note, clashes between the police and ACC demonstrators occurred because the ACC challenged and actively resisted the containment of their demonstration and the police reacted in ways to reinstate that containment (Noakes et al. 2005, 251; see also Vitale 2005).…”
Section: Zones Law and Dissentmentioning
confidence: 99%