2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Amphibians Are More Sensitive than Mammals to Xenobiotics

Abstract: Dramatic declines in amphibian populations have been described all over the world since the 1980s. The evidence that the sensitivity to environmental threats is greater in amphibians than in mammals has been generally linked to the observation that amphibians are characterized by a rather permeable skin. Nevertheless, a numerical comparison of data of percutaneous (through the skin) passage between amphibians and mammals is lacking. Therefore, in this investigation we have measured the percutaneous passage of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
89
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative impacts on wild amphibians is especially concerning given that the dose examined here (2.5 ppb) is in the range that animals experience year-round in areas where atrazine is used (1,32,46), well within levels found in rainfall (47), in which levels can exceed 100 ppb in the midwestern United States (48), and below the current US Environmental Protection Agency drinking water standard of 3 ppb (49). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that frog skin absorbs atrazine at much higher rates than the skin of mammals (50), and even semiterrestrial frog species take up significant amounts of atrazine (51). Thus, the exposure level examined in the present study is relevant even to semiterrestrial amphibians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative impacts on wild amphibians is especially concerning given that the dose examined here (2.5 ppb) is in the range that animals experience year-round in areas where atrazine is used (1,32,46), well within levels found in rainfall (47), in which levels can exceed 100 ppb in the midwestern United States (48), and below the current US Environmental Protection Agency drinking water standard of 3 ppb (49). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that frog skin absorbs atrazine at much higher rates than the skin of mammals (50), and even semiterrestrial frog species take up significant amounts of atrazine (51). Thus, the exposure level examined in the present study is relevant even to semiterrestrial amphibians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26) By applying this method to the ventral skin of adult Rana esculenta, the linear correlation between log P e (permeation coefficients) and log K ow was confirmed for five chemicals. 30) Therefore, the observed discrepancy in the correlation of absorption parameters with log K ow may originate from the different application method of pesticides, i.e., solid deposit or aqueous solution.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amphibians are excellent indicators of environmental quality because their permeable skin allows for exchange of materials with the surrounding environment (Quaranta et al 2009). The combination of multiple stressors, such as rising temperatures, environmental degradation, and shifting ecosystem dynamics, can lead to greater stress and negative consequences for amphibian populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%