2001
DOI: 10.1145/603867.603872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why and how to benchmark XML databases

Abstract: Benchmarks belong to the very standard repertory of tools deployed in database development. Assessing the capabilities of a system, analyzing actual and potential bottlenecks, and, naturally, comparing the pros and cons of different systems architectures have become indispensable tasks as databases management systems grow in complexity and capacity. In the course of the development of XML databases the need for a benchmark framework has become more and more evident: a great many different ways to store XML dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally we implemented and evaluated our framework as a new XML-to-RDBMS mapping technique. Our experiment has demonstrated support for a wider range of XPath/XQuery (Schmidt et al 2001) queries, greater potential for optimisation through parallel processing of query components, reduced resource overheads, and reduced complexity of XML updates compared to alternatives in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally we implemented and evaluated our framework as a new XML-to-RDBMS mapping technique. Our experiment has demonstrated support for a wider range of XPath/XQuery (Schmidt et al 2001) queries, greater potential for optimisation through parallel processing of query components, reduced resource overheads, and reduced complexity of XML updates compared to alternatives in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We considered eight database functionalities (extracted from the XMark project (Schmidt et al 2001)), listed in Table2.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its current version, xmlgen requires less than 2 MB of mainmemory, and produces documents of sizes of 100 MB and 1 GB in 33.4 and 335.5 seconds, respectively (450MHz Pentium III). A more detailed description of the tool and downloads can be found on the project Web page [18].…”
Section: The Document Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have experimented with XViz applied to three different workloads: the XMark benchmark [12], the XQuery Use Cases [6], and the XMach benchmark [4]. We describe here XMark only, which is shown in Fig.…”
Section: An Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first occurs in XQueries 8,9,10,11,12,17 is connected by a dotted edge (i.e. ⊃) to the second one, which also occurs in XQuery 1.…”
Section: An Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%