2005
DOI: 10.3200/tchs.79.1.45-50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Are "Bad Boys" always Black?: Causes of Disproportionality in School Discipline and Recommendations for Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
138
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that this discourse and popular ideas of Black male deviancy spill over into the schools, influencing how Black boys are perceived and treated by others. For example, teachers of Black males regularly interpret the behaviors of Black boys as aggressive, disrespectful, defiant, and intimidating even when their behaviors were not intended to be so (Davis 2003;Ferguson 2000Ferguson , 2005Monroe 2005). The imprecise interpretation of these behaviors results in discipline that is often unnecessary, unfair, and in many cases, harsher for Black boys than it would be for their White counterparts (Monroe 2005;Skiba 2001).…”
Section: Structural Barriersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It follows that this discourse and popular ideas of Black male deviancy spill over into the schools, influencing how Black boys are perceived and treated by others. For example, teachers of Black males regularly interpret the behaviors of Black boys as aggressive, disrespectful, defiant, and intimidating even when their behaviors were not intended to be so (Davis 2003;Ferguson 2000Ferguson , 2005Monroe 2005). The imprecise interpretation of these behaviors results in discipline that is often unnecessary, unfair, and in many cases, harsher for Black boys than it would be for their White counterparts (Monroe 2005;Skiba 2001).…”
Section: Structural Barriersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Classed forms of laddism should also be seen in dialogue with and hierarchical relation to other masculinities. For instance, as in the US, black boys in the UK are more frequently defined as disorderly and in school contexts excluded (expelled) at higher rates than their white counterparts (Monroe 2005). This draws on the construction of black masculinities as inherently sinister and problematic, which may grant white laddism a certain amount of impunity.…”
Section: Laddism In the Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, risk ratios for being assigned to special education were two percent higher for minority students than Caucasian students (Hosp & Reschly, 2003). Furthermore, available literature clearly demonstrates that African American students are more likely to be referred to and placed in special education than their majority peers (Armor, 2006;Artiles & Bal, 2008;Cartledge, 2005;Davis, 2005;Farkas, 2003;Harry & Klingner, 2007;Hosp & Reschly, 2003;Miller & Ward, 2008;Monroe, 2005;Patton, 1998). Finally, disproportionate referral of minority students to special education varies by disability type.…”
Section: Disproportionate Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disproportionality is a complex problem and a host of contributing factors has been cited in the literature to include societal factors, racism in education, classroom management failures, cultural unresponsiveness, varied definitions and implementation of special education, as well as biases in the educational and referral process itself (Armor, 2006;Artiles & Bal, 2008;Artiles & Trent, 1994;Coutinho & Oswald, 2000;Evans, 2005;Farkas, 2003;Harry & Klingner, 2007;Miller & Ward, 2008;Monroe, 2005;Patton, 1998;Singham, 2003;Skiba, Poloni-Staudinger, Simmons, Feggins-Azziz, & Chung, 2005;Warner, Dede, Garvan, & Conway, 2002). The negative implications of disproportionality include curriculum limitations, lower academic achievement, decreased participation in postsecondary education, and decreased employment opportunities for those identified and placed in special education (Patton, 1998).…”
Section: Intervention Disproportionate Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%