2009
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why are diverse relationships observed between phytoplankton biomass and transport time?

Abstract: Transport time scales such as flushing time and residence time are often used to explain variability in phytoplankton biomass. In many cases, empirical data are consistent with a positive phytoplankton-transport time relationship (i.e., phytoplankton biomass increases as transport time increases). However, negative relationships, varying relationships, or no significant relationship may also be observed. We present a simple conceptual model, in both mathematical and graphical form, to help explain why phytopla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
106
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of freshwater inflow, the flushing time of the SLE is approximately 20 d solely through tidal exchange (Y. Wan and D. Sun, unpublished data). Nutrient budget results suggested that both the concentrations and internal utilization of DIP and DIN stabilized with flushing times greater than 10 d. Longer water residence times allow for increased grazing and sedimentation to respond to primary production and balance system metabolism (Buzzelli et al, 2007;Lucas et al, 2009;Phlips et al, 2011;Swaney et al, 2011). In fact, it appears that the negative relationship between flushing time and NEM observed in this study is a common attribute of many estuaries (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In the absence of freshwater inflow, the flushing time of the SLE is approximately 20 d solely through tidal exchange (Y. Wan and D. Sun, unpublished data). Nutrient budget results suggested that both the concentrations and internal utilization of DIP and DIN stabilized with flushing times greater than 10 d. Longer water residence times allow for increased grazing and sedimentation to respond to primary production and balance system metabolism (Buzzelli et al, 2007;Lucas et al, 2009;Phlips et al, 2011;Swaney et al, 2011). In fact, it appears that the negative relationship between flushing time and NEM observed in this study is a common attribute of many estuaries (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It has been shown with a simple model of a vertically homogeneous advective system that if growth is faster than losses, phytoplankton biomass will indeed increase with time spent in the system (as is commonly expected); on the other hand, if losses dominate over growth, phytoplankton biomass will decrease with time spent in the system (Lucas et al 2009b). That model (which previously only calculated biomass concentration exiting the habitat) is extended herein to calculate habitat averaged biomass and net primary productivity.…”
Section: Model Testing Of Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective was to explore the relationship between phytoplankton and the time it spends in a habitat, and how that relationship is affected by benthic grazing rate. Thus, the role of s tran here is to characterize the time for a water parcel to travel through a defined habitat, from inlet to exit (i.e., a ''transit time''); this quantity thus represents the time phytoplankton within the parcel are exposed to growth-loss conditions within the habitat (Lucas et al 2009b). (See Lucas [2010] for discussion of how ''transit time'' is related to commonly referenced terms such as ''flushing time'' and ''residence time.'')…”
Section: General Model Description and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, residence time of water and associated phytoplankton and zooplankton communities can increase within the upper portion of estuaries, facilitating the accumulation of biomass within this region (Lucas et al 2009). Second, smaller order tidal freshwater river channels are characterized by much greater water column irradiance than the non-tidal channels upstream, allowing for pulses of phytoplankton biomass to develop (Ensign et al 2012).…”
Section: Indirect Effects Of Planktivorous Fish On Phytoplankton Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%