2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Are High-Achieving Students Susceptible to Inhibition? An Idiographic Analysis of Student Self-Identity in China

Abstract: High-achieving students face greater expectations in competitive societies such as China, which can impede their performance. Based on previous observations regarding what we call the “inhibition phenomenon of high-achieving students,” wherein otherwise successful students show unexpectedly poor performances in collective activities of relatively unfamiliar forms, the present research analyzes the self-identity of such students and explores the underlying mechanisms that result in this inhibition phenomenon. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-identity Scale Self-identity was measured by the Self-identity Scale (SIS), which was compiled by psychologists Ochse and Plug according to Eriksson's theory (Ochse and Plug, 1986). The scale has been translated and debugged into a Chinese version by scholars and has been widely used in China with good reliability and validity (Qasim et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2019). There are 19 items on the scale, such as "I am proud of being a member of the group" and "my value is recognized by others."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-identity Scale Self-identity was measured by the Self-identity Scale (SIS), which was compiled by psychologists Ochse and Plug according to Eriksson's theory (Ochse and Plug, 1986). The scale has been translated and debugged into a Chinese version by scholars and has been widely used in China with good reliability and validity (Qasim et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2019). There are 19 items on the scale, such as "I am proud of being a member of the group" and "my value is recognized by others."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item was rated on a 4‐point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree ). The scale has good reliability and validity and has been widely used in China (Wu et al, 2019, 2020). A low score indicates a less developed self‐identity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China's current test-oriented education system is characterized by the college entrance examination, where assessment is primarily presented through ranking and grading to select students. Consequently, students, particularly those constantly pursuing outstanding academic achievements, often need a sense of self-identity [35] . During the activity, students assumed various corresponding responsibilities and worked collaboratively in groups to complete the assigned tasks.…”
Section: Increased Acknowledgment Of Self-identitymentioning
confidence: 99%