1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Are Juveniles Smaller Than Their Parents?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we measured only adults, we found that FA decreased with body size regardless of context. Because body size tends to be correlated with age (Ellstrand, 1983), this suggests that older individuals exhibit lower levels of asymmetry than younger individuals. An intriguing alternative hypothesis is that FA may be reduced with age because of compensatory growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we measured only adults, we found that FA decreased with body size regardless of context. Because body size tends to be correlated with age (Ellstrand, 1983), this suggests that older individuals exhibit lower levels of asymmetry than younger individuals. An intriguing alternative hypothesis is that FA may be reduced with age because of compensatory growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolution is fundamentally the product of more than a single factor. Beyond the four classic “forces”, evolution also depends on various constraints such as history, demography, development, organismal structure, genomic structure, and environment (e.g., Antonovics, 1976; Ellstrand, 1983; Gould and Lewontin, 1979). The point here is that none of these should be stereotyped without good reason.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next principle-which follows from sexual reproduction-is that offspring are always born smaller than their mothers, as highlighted satirically by Ellstrand. [3] He named this the juvenile small size (JSS) principle and offered six supposedly serious reasons why it should hold. These included plausible considerations of population dispersal, predation, and parent-offspring competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%