Why are migrant campaigns different from homeland campaigns? Understanding belonging in context among UK‐Sudanese activists

Abstract

Migrant communities' homeland‐oriented political campaigns are always related to, but often different from, the activism in which local people engage in their homeland setting. In seeking to understand the observed disparities between migrant campaigns and homeland activism, several studies have demonstrated the influence of contextual factors like political opportunity structures on homeland‐oriented migrant politics. Complementing these studies are works that focus on changes to identity and belonging associated with migration and resettlement. In this article, I build on these debates by offering a combined analysis of the intersections between, and interplay of, contextual and identity‐based factors. I use this analytical approach to examine the case of Sudanese political activists resident in the UK. I demonstrate how forms of belonging emerge here as part of – and not in isolation from – the strategic navigations of multiple political contexts and opportunities. In doing so, I contribute to our understanding of how belonging can be contextualized to serve as an analytical lens for understanding homeland‐oriented migrant activism.

Transnational Lived Citizenship – The Case of the Eritrean Diaspora

“…An important element of these strategies is the extension of citizenship rights to their populations abroad in return for certain responsibilities and duties (Cohen, 2017; Collyer and King, 2015; Gamlen, 2008; Levitt and de la Dehesa, 2003). These dynamics are analysed in the rapidly expanding literature on diaspora members as political actors (Kleist, 2008; Müller-Funk and Krawatzek, forthcoming; Turner, 2013; Van Hear and Cohen, 2017; Wilcock, 2019).…”

Social Media and Forced Migration: The Subversion and Subjugation of Political Life

“…These concerns range from limiting refugees' commitments and activities in everyday public life in settlement contexts to how state actors can use these tools for surveillance, mass communication and to exert influence and control (Gillespie et al, 2018;Loh, 2016;Maitland, 2018). Other scholars have noted how diaspora networks can potentially inflame tensions and destabilise peace-building activities where diaspora networks can play both "constructive" and "destructive" roles (Brinkerhoff, 2008;Orjuela, 2008;Wilcock, 2018).…”

The Karen diaspora : transnational sense of belonging and practices after the 2021 Myanmar Coup

“…Refugees' connection to their homeland might stem from a need for purpose, alienation, isolation, or restricted social and political engagement in host countries, all of which can result in the reproduction of the homeland culture (Wilcock, 2019).…”