2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-021-00860-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Context Matters: The Influence of Application Domain on Preferred Degree of Anthropomorphism and Gender Attribution in Human–Robot Interaction

Abstract: The application of anthropomorphic design features is widely believed to facilitate human–robot interaction. However, the preference for robots’ anthropomorphism is highly context sensitive, as different application domains induce different expectations towards robots. In this study the influence of application domain on the preferred degree of anthropomorphism is examined. Moreover, as anthropomorphic design can reinforce existing gender stereotypes of different work domains, gender associations were investig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it might be interesting to explore more qualitative and indirect ways to measure the robot's genderedness so as to circumvent the described conundrum. For instance, Roesler et al [72] used naming frequency to understand how the robots in their study were attributed a gender, which gave participants the possibility not just to give robots traditional names, but also technical and more object-oriented ones. As such, we put forward the following guideline: Guideline 9: Explore more subtle and less biasing ways of checking whether gender is attributed to the robot and even relevant for participants, for instance, through qualitative and indirect measures.…”
Section: Discussion On Manipulation Of Robot's Genderedness (Rq1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it might be interesting to explore more qualitative and indirect ways to measure the robot's genderedness so as to circumvent the described conundrum. For instance, Roesler et al [72] used naming frequency to understand how the robots in their study were attributed a gender, which gave participants the possibility not just to give robots traditional names, but also technical and more object-oriented ones. As such, we put forward the following guideline: Guideline 9: Explore more subtle and less biasing ways of checking whether gender is attributed to the robot and even relevant for participants, for instance, through qualitative and indirect measures.…”
Section: Discussion On Manipulation Of Robot's Genderedness (Rq1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropomorphism refers to imbuing human‐like traits, attributes, motives, intentions, or emotions into nonhuman agents, such as products, devices, robots, and service machines (Epley et al, 2007; Fan et al, 2020; Roesler et al, 2022). When people interact with such inanimate life‐like technologies, they engage in social cognitive processes, which further helps them understand the technology better, and therefore, enhances their adoption of these technologies (Yoganathan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropomorphism refers to imbuing human-like traits, attributes, motives, intentions, or emotions into nonhuman agents, such as products, devices, robots, and service machines (Epley et al, 2007;Fan et al, 2020;Roesler et al, 2022). When people interact with such inanimate life-like…”
Section: Anthropomorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few empirical studies have so far addressed potential interaction effects of anthropomorphism and application context. In Roesler and colleagues' recent experiment (Roesler et al, 2022), participants had to choose one out of various robot pictures that differed in visual human-likeness based on different context descriptions. A lower degree of humanlikeness was found to be preferred for industrial application and a higher degree of human-likeness for social application, while there were no clear preferences in the service domain.…”
Section: Acceptance and Application Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%