1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1983.tb03130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why de young birds reproduce less well?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
286
5
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
17
286
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the expectation that the expression of morphological and behavioral traits is constrained in young individuals (Curio 1983), we found that the greatest change in trait values occurred from yearlings to 2-yearold males. During the first 6 months of their life, male black grouse grow rapidly, increasing their body mass approximately 50-fold.…”
Section: Effects Of Age On Trait Expressionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Consistent with the expectation that the expression of morphological and behavioral traits is constrained in young individuals (Curio 1983), we found that the greatest change in trait values occurred from yearlings to 2-yearold males. During the first 6 months of their life, male black grouse grow rapidly, increasing their body mass approximately 50-fold.…”
Section: Effects Of Age On Trait Expressionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This early improvement in mean reproductive success can be explained by a number of different mechanisms (Lack 1966;Forslund & Pärt 1995). First, there may be progressive disappearance of poor-quality breeders (selection hypothesis, Curio 1983) or progressive appearance of good quality breeders (delayed breeding hypothesis; Forslund & Pärt 1995). In these cases of individual heterogeneity, age-specific population trends in breeding performance may differ markedly from individual changes in breeding performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…variation between patch quality at the interpopulation level or between years in a given patch, hereafter referred to as the distant extrinsic variation); (ii) variation in environmental quality affecting the individuals of a given population differently (e.g. heterogeneity of breeding site quality within the patch, hereafter, proximal extrinsic variation); (iii) variation in quality among reproducing pairs (hereafter referred to as the intrinsic variation), related either to the variance in the additive qualities of the pair members [4,5] or to their genetic compatibility [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%