2015
DOI: 10.1177/1359105315618000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do diets fail? An exploration of dieters’ experiences using thematic analysis

Abstract: Previous research has drawn on theoretical models and clinical observations to develop propositions regarding the mechanisms of diet failure, with only one study examining it directly from the perspective of dieters themselves. Furthermore, research to date has failed to provide an empirically validated, multi-factorial model of diet failure, despite the issue being recognised as a complex and multifaceted one. This study extended on previous research by examining themes of diet failure from the perspective of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To alleviate this limitation, we restricted weight-loss coding to those who did not exhibit a re-gain in weight at a later visit over the 3 years of the study. Our logic was based on the unfortunate fact that most diets fail and can be characterized by re-gain of original weight lost [20, 21]. However, we also performed a sensitivity analysis classifying cachexia without removing those who regained weight later in the study and still observed a statistically significant increased risk of death for COPD cases with cachexia (Additional file 1: Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate this limitation, we restricted weight-loss coding to those who did not exhibit a re-gain in weight at a later visit over the 3 years of the study. Our logic was based on the unfortunate fact that most diets fail and can be characterized by re-gain of original weight lost [20, 21]. However, we also performed a sensitivity analysis classifying cachexia without removing those who regained weight later in the study and still observed a statistically significant increased risk of death for COPD cases with cachexia (Additional file 1: Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, “the determination of the position of the person within the life space is the first prerequisite for understanding behavior” (Lewin, 1946b, p. 248). These forces are usually difficult to change, as people find when they try to change their behavior (Buchanan & Sheffield, 2017; Hawkes, 2016). Thus, Lewin (1947c) saw unfreezing as a challenging process of reeducation (Lewin & Grabbe, 1945), whereby, as Benne (1976) notes, “Men and women alter, replace, or transcend patterns of thinking, valuation, volition, or overt behavior” (p. 29).…”
Section: Discussion: Lewin’s Three-step Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disparity is in part explained by low rates of adherence to available programs that would otherwise result in desired weight loss . In fact, there is little doubt that adherence is more important to obesity management than the type of diet prescribed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%