Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales

Abstract

n recent decades internationalization has risen to prominence in higher edu-cation institutions (HEIs). Scholars have identified several rationales for internationaliza-tion. There is however a lack of conceptual understanding and empirical evidence forwhich rationale(s) for internationalization are chosen by a given HEI and why. The goal ofthis article is to fill this gap. We develop and test a conceptual framework to predict thesalience of a given rationale for a specific HEI. The framework integrates factors atmultiple levels, namely competitive and institutional forces in the global and nationalcontexts, the organizational goals and the influence of internal actors. The empiricalanalysis employs information on more than 400 European HEIs from two large datasets ontheir organizational characteristics and from a large-scale survey on internationalization ofuniversities. The findings show that the HEIs embedded in a global context more fre-quently conceive internationalization as an instrumental to prestige. The national contextsdo not greatly affect HEIs’ rationales, and the amount of res.ources is less important thanthe competition for resources. Organizational goals as well as the influence of students,faculty members and middle managers on the internationalization process partly predict theprominence of specific rationales. The paper closes discussing the findings and theimplication for scholarly researc

Sociocultural Adjustment and Coping Strategies of Korean and Japanese Students in a Thai International College

“…Therefore, international higher education campuses and classrooms are rapidly becoming more ethnically diverse (Bass and Bass 2008) and researchers are taking notice. International students have become the focus of growing interest among educational researchers (Seeber et al 2016). However, this was not always the case.…”

Internationalization in U.S. universities: history, philosophy, practice, and future

“…These include the philosophy, the motivation, the new nationalization, and world rankings of universities. Seeber, Cattaneo, Huisman, and Paleari (2016) studied the internationalization motivations of over 400 European universities. Using the results of the International Association of Universities survey (EGRON-POLAK & HUDSON, 2014) and two datasets with organizational data from European universities, they developed a multi-level theoretical model that considered macro factors (global and national contexts), meso factors (higher education institutional factors), and micro factors (actors who influenced internationalization decisions).…”

Motives and Measures of Higher Education Internationalisation: A Case Study of a Canadian University

“…Canadian institutions mostly practice international partnerships through enabling students to transfer credits across the institutions they study in to continue their education in the partner institutions in other countries. However, there are instances of Canadian HEIs opening branches or local campuses in Middle Eastern countries (Seeber et al, 2016).…”

“…HEIs are involved in partnerships, alliances and collaborations with other institutions, organisations and individuals. The objectives of these international partnerships are to achieve a range of benefits: international prestige (Seeber, Cattaneo, Huisman, & Paleari, 2016), knowledge development, innovation, financial income and curriculum internationalisation (Haigh, 2014). The aim of this article is to investigate and identify the institutional motives of internationalisation and institutional partnerships, methods of partnerships and to measure the quality and progress of internationalisation in a higher education institution.…”