2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do infants pull their ears?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that most reviewed guidelines recommend enquiring about parent/caregiver observation led to a non-systematic citation and key-word library and Google Scholar search for studies relating to efficacy of this activity [ 60 65 ]. A review of these studies using the GRADE approach found low certainty of evidence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that most reviewed guidelines recommend enquiring about parent/caregiver observation led to a non-systematic citation and key-word library and Google Scholar search for studies relating to efficacy of this activity [ 60 65 ]. A review of these studies using the GRADE approach found low certainty of evidence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of caregiver-reporting of signs and symptoms as a predictor of OM varies widely. [22][23][24][25] Parent/ carer concern correctly identifies children with OM 17-83% of the time, and correctly identifies children without OM 36-93% of the time. 23 Consensus statement is also low (sensitivity, 6.0-19.7%), with positive predictive values of 22.0-82.1%.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of evidence. Accuracy of caregiver‐reporting of signs and symptoms as a predictor of OM varies widely 22‐25 . Parent/carer concern correctly identifies children with OM 17–83% of the time, and correctly identifies children without OM 36–93% of the time 23 .…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations