2008
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do Men Rape? An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective

Abstract: Rape of women by men has occurred throughout recorded history and across cultures. In this article, we discuss rape from an evolutionary psychological perspective. Evolutionary psychology is a powerful heuristic tool that allows researchers to develop and test novel hypotheses about complex behaviors such as rape. Some researchers have argued that men have evolved psychological mechanisms that motivate them to rape in specific contexts. We discuss evidence consistent with this claim, and argue that a more nuan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
34
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, sexual conflict in humans is a growing field of study among evolutionary psychologists, and many researchers have studied conflict over sexual access (e.g., McKibbin et al, 2008) conflict that occurs during and after mating (e.g., , and conflict occurring that occurs after conception (e.g., Anderson et al, 2007), for example. Arnqvist and Rowe's (2005) reluctance to discuss sexual conflict in humans in their monograph, Sexual Conflict, might be attributable to the different empirical approaches Sexual Conflict in Humans p.11 employed by behavioral ecologists and evolutionary psychologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, sexual conflict in humans is a growing field of study among evolutionary psychologists, and many researchers have studied conflict over sexual access (e.g., McKibbin et al, 2008) conflict that occurs during and after mating (e.g., , and conflict occurring that occurs after conception (e.g., Anderson et al, 2007), for example. Arnqvist and Rowe's (2005) reluctance to discuss sexual conflict in humans in their monograph, Sexual Conflict, might be attributable to the different empirical approaches Sexual Conflict in Humans p.11 employed by behavioral ecologists and evolutionary psychologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is yet undetermined whether the psychology associated with rape is an adaptation that was directly selected for or a byproduct of other psychological mechanisms (e.g., McKibbin et al, 2008), but what is known is that sexual coercion is a consequence of conflict over sexual access. It follows from parental investment theory that men will have a stronger desire for sexual variety and will be more sexually persistent, whereas women will be more sexually restricted (Buss & Schmitt, 1993;Schaller & Murray, 2008;Schmitt, 2005).…”
Section: Sexual Conflict Associated With Parental Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research evidence suggests that would-be rapists also may prefer and target more attractive women, in order to maximize the probability of conception (Ghiglieri, 2000;Greenfield, 1997;Kilpatrick et al, 1992;McKibbin, Shackelford, Goetz, & Starratt, 2008;Thornhill & Palmer, 2000;Thornhill & Thornhill, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Abrahms et al (2003); McKibbin et al (2008); Marnie et al (2005); Thornhill and Palmer (2000); Pauwels (2002) and Buddie and Miller (2001) for details. It is a concern to their families and healthcare professionals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%