2020
DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.14011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do pathway methods work better than they should?

Abstract: Pathway analysis methods are frequently applied to cancer gene expression data to identify dysregulated pathways. These methods often infer pathway activity based on the expression of genes belonging to a given pathway, even though the proteins ultimately determine the activity of a given pathway. Furthermore, the association between gene expression levels and protein activities is not well‐characterized. Here, we posit that pathway‐based methods are effective not because of the correlation between expression … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our feature genes exhibited certain correlations with known driver genes, this itself does not provide direct evidence of their functional significance. Feature genes could also be the result of the downstream effects of mutational activities or be co-opted as a representation of an aberrant region where the pathogenetic activity is provided by different genomic elements (Szalai and Saez-Rodriguez, 2020 ). In the analysis, we were prudent to limit propositions of the impact of individual feature genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our feature genes exhibited certain correlations with known driver genes, this itself does not provide direct evidence of their functional significance. Feature genes could also be the result of the downstream effects of mutational activities or be co-opted as a representation of an aberrant region where the pathogenetic activity is provided by different genomic elements (Szalai and Saez-Rodriguez, 2020 ). In the analysis, we were prudent to limit propositions of the impact of individual feature genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to existing methods that use gene expression as a direct proxy for signaling [82][83][84][85], our approach infers transcription factor activities from the expression data and uses these as an anchor to infer upstream signaling networks relevant to the regulation of our phenotypes. Transcription factor activities can represent the outcome of a signal transduction process compared to the expression profiles and are thus a better proxy for cell signaling activities of the cell [86]. Such an approach has been previously used, for example by the tool CARNIVAL [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phosphorylation, acetylation) of signaling proteins constituting the pathway. Thus, mapping transcriptomic signatures of pathway genes to compute pathway activities can produce misleading target pathway hypotheses ( Szalai and Saez-Rodriguez, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%