2004
DOI: 10.3102/01623737026002111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do School District Budget Referenda Fail?

Abstract: Abstract[Excerpt] Public elementary and secondary education is financed in many states at least partially at the local level and school district budgets in many states are determined by voter referenda. To date, however, there have been no studies that sought to explain why the proportion of school district budget proposals in a state that are approved by voters in referenda varies over time. Similarly no research has used panel data on school districts to test whether budget referenda failures are concentrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, individuals who actively choose to send their children outside of their local district may be even further disinclined to provide support to the local system. This logic follows findings with regard to communities with large private school enrollments and their support for local public schools (Ehrenberg et al, 2004). At the same time, leaders of districts that face large numbers of student exit (or threat of exit) may seek to make capital improvements to not only attract nonresidents but also retain resident students (Arsen & Davis, 2006).…”
Section: Public School Capital Funding and Bond Referendasupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, individuals who actively choose to send their children outside of their local district may be even further disinclined to provide support to the local system. This logic follows findings with regard to communities with large private school enrollments and their support for local public schools (Ehrenberg et al, 2004). At the same time, leaders of districts that face large numbers of student exit (or threat of exit) may seek to make capital improvements to not only attract nonresidents but also retain resident students (Arsen & Davis, 2006).…”
Section: Public School Capital Funding and Bond Referendasupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Research on school bond passage has focused on several key variables, including resident population characteristics (e.g., age, income status, and race/ethnicity), student characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity), district characteristics (e.g., long-term indebtedness, employee costs), and bond characteristics (e.g., amount, number of times proposed) (Bowers & Lee, 2013; Bowers, Metzger, & Militello, 2010; Ehrenberg, Ehrenberg, Smith, & Zhang, 2004; Glass, 2008; Ingle et al, 2013; Ladd & Murray, 2001; Sielke, 1998; Zimmer et al, 2011; Zimmer & Jones, 2005). Recent articles by Bowers and Lee (2013) and Ingle et al (2013) provide extensive reviews of the extant research on predictors of school bond passage.…”
Section: Public School Capital Funding and Bond Referendamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The median county turnout for statewide elections in 1999-a year without presidential, gubernatorial, or congressional campaigns-was about 37%. Further analysis of referenda can be found in Ehrenberg et al (2004). property, V j is the total value of district property, B j is the school budget, and Aid j is outside aid.…”
Section: Local School Finance and Tax Relief In New York Statementioning
confidence: 99%