2016
DOI: 10.1080/10454446.2016.1141137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do We Buy Traditional Foods?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the variable “origin”, there is extensive literature that links traditional products with the place of origin (Verbeke and Roosen, 2009; Cerjak et al , 2014; Contini et al , 2016). European Union have a regulation (Becker and Staus, 2008) that relates the quality product with environmental and traditional characteristics, to the place of origin (European Union, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the variable “origin”, there is extensive literature that links traditional products with the place of origin (Verbeke and Roosen, 2009; Cerjak et al , 2014; Contini et al , 2016). European Union have a regulation (Becker and Staus, 2008) that relates the quality product with environmental and traditional characteristics, to the place of origin (European Union, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond extended methodologies, CUB modeling is also under active development for applications; in this respect, we quote original marketing research in the field of food preferences and sensory analysis: Piccolo and D’Elia (2008), Iannario et al (2012), Corduas, Cinquanta, and Ievoli (2013), Capecchi et al (2016), Mauracher, Procidano, and Sacchi (2016), and Contini et al (2016). We also quote recent new perspectives and applications (Hwang, Sohn, and Oh 2015; Low 2017; Finch and Hernández Finch 2020; Hu, Zhou, and Sharma 2020; and Xu and Zhang 2021), providing evidence of an increasing international interest toward the CUB paradigm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographical distribution of the consumers’ sample in the extant studies. Most of the studies included in this literature review focused on the OO preference for Italian (35.5%) [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] and Spanish (24.4%) [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ] consumers, followed by studies focused on the OO preference of consumers from Greece (11.1%) [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], the USA (6.7%) [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], Chile [ 59 , 60 ], UK and German [ 61 , 62 ] and Tunisia [ 63 , 64 ] (4.4%), Japan [ 65 ], Brazil [ 66 ], Netherlands [ 30 ], Switzerland [ 67 ], Uruguay [ 68 ], France [ 63 ] (2.2%).…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a report, we group the size of the studies into four categories: less than 200 consumers, between 200 and 500 consumers, between 500 and 1000 consumers, and more than 1000 consumers. It emerges that 31.1% of the studies involve a sample with a size of less than 200 consumers [ 27 , 28 , 31 , 36 , 48 , 52 , 53 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 62 , 66 , 67 , 68 ], 33.3% of the studies involve a sample with a size between 200 and 500 consumers [ 30 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 49 , 59 , 60 , 63 , 64 , 69 ], 22.2% of the studies involve a sample with a size between 500 and 1000 consumers [ 29 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 41 , 47 , 51 , 61 , 70 ] and only 11.11% of the studies involve a sample with a size more than 1000 consumers [ 34 , 38 , 54 , 55 , 65 ]. In 8.8% of the reviewed studies, the sample size is not declared [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 50 ].…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation