2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0026659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.

Abstract: Sense of belonging to math-one's feelings of membership and acceptance in the math domain-was established as a new and an important factor in the representation gap between males and females in math. First, a new scale of sense of belonging to math was created and validated, and was found to predict unique variance in college students' intent to pursue math in the future (Studies 1-2). Second, in a longitudinal study of calculus students (Study 3), students' perceptions of 2 factors in their math environment-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
881
8
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 811 publications
(933 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(76 reference statements)
37
881
8
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Implicit theories can be affected by situational influences and feedback: for example, implicit theories of intelligence are shaped by the type of praise that teachers and parents offer in response to the student's achievements (Mueller & Dweck, 1998) and the attitudes that important others express about intelligence (Good, Dweck, & Rattan, 2012). Implicit theories remain stable over time in the absence of an event or manipulation that leads students to reflect upon and revise their view (e.g., Blackwell, Trzesniewski, & Dweck, 2007;Dweck, Chiu, & Hong, 1995a).…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implicit theories can be affected by situational influences and feedback: for example, implicit theories of intelligence are shaped by the type of praise that teachers and parents offer in response to the student's achievements (Mueller & Dweck, 1998) and the attitudes that important others express about intelligence (Good, Dweck, & Rattan, 2012). Implicit theories remain stable over time in the absence of an event or manipulation that leads students to reflect upon and revise their view (e.g., Blackwell, Trzesniewski, & Dweck, 2007;Dweck, Chiu, & Hong, 1995a).…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research shows that implicit theories can quite readily be shifted by feedback, argument or intervention favoring one perspective (Good et al, 2012;Mueller & Dweck, 1998;Aronson, et al, 2002;Hong et al, 1999;Plaks & Stecher, 2007); Dweck and Leggett (1988) recognized the possibility that yet other situational factors might alter people's implicit beliefs.…”
Section: Theory Fluidity Versus Chronicity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 At the beginning of the semester, students' self-views of intelligence were assessed generally 14 and specifically related to comfort with mathematics. 25 Student attitudes toward team learning were assessed using a previously validated tool on team-based learning at the beginning of the semester. 26 Overall, we hypothesized that students' personality and attitudes towards team learning would partially explain interindividual variability in learning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These identities are framed by upbringing, experiences, and society at large, and can shift across time either unconsciously or through deliberate effort. 32 Belonging to valued social groups is a fundamental human need and a sense of inclusion is particularly important for underrepresented groups in STEM when stereotypes imply that they might be unsuitable to certain settings, such as rigorous academic classes. [33][34][35] Feeling a sense of belonging and acceptance by others in STEM (faculty and peers) is crucial to retention and persistence for these STEM students.…”
Section: Cultural Distinction Theory and Academic Attainment Of Foreimentioning
confidence: 99%