1989
DOI: 10.2307/2112823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Does Jane Read and Write so Well? The Anomaly of Women's Achievement

Abstract: Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
102
0
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
102
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the "good student" role is a more important part of girls' self-concepts than boys', and so they are more likely to be troubled by feedback that places this valued component of their self-concepts at risk. Boys are not unaffected by such feedback, but they are much more likely to reject or ignore it than to let it breed self-doubt (Correll 2001;Mickelson 1989;Wigfield and Eccles 2002). This pattern is the adolescent version of the common finding that the internalization (as opposed to externalization) of negative feedback is more likely to occur among individuals in relatively low-status positions in society, including women (Cast et al 1999;Yeung and Martin 2003).…”
Section: Gender and The Socially Constructed Selfmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the "good student" role is a more important part of girls' self-concepts than boys', and so they are more likely to be troubled by feedback that places this valued component of their self-concepts at risk. Boys are not unaffected by such feedback, but they are much more likely to reject or ignore it than to let it breed self-doubt (Correll 2001;Mickelson 1989;Wigfield and Eccles 2002). This pattern is the adolescent version of the common finding that the internalization (as opposed to externalization) of negative feedback is more likely to occur among individuals in relatively low-status positions in society, including women (Cast et al 1999;Yeung and Martin 2003).…”
Section: Gender and The Socially Constructed Selfmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When this happens, they often react by disengaging from academic pursuits, avoiding more demanding coursework, and generally underperforming in school. In the end, these self-and otherperceptions, no matter how accurate or inaccurate their foundations, come true (Marsh et al 2005;Mickelson 1989;Seymour and Hewitt 1997;Wigfield and Eccles 2002). Although a general phenomenon, not all students react the same way.…”
Section: The Stakes Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From differential reference group theory (Mickelson, 1989), it is assumed that female students use other women as their reference. When girls in their adolescence observe that women's positions in the labour market have improved, this might augment girls' motivation to perform well in school.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizirajući različite međunarodne znanstvene spoznaje može se utvrditi da djevojčice postižu viša obrazovna postignuća iskazana školskim ocjenama, dok u slučajevima kada je obrazovno postignuće iskazano rezultatom na vanjskom vrednovanju spolne razlike ovise o ispitivanom području i dobi učenika (Duckworth i Seligman, 2006.). Od vrtića pa do visokoškolske razine učenice postižu viša obrazovna postignuća iskazana školskim ocjenama u svim predmetima, uključujući matematiku i prirodne znanosti (Mickelson, 1989.;Perkins, Kleiner, Roey i Brown, 2004.). U slučaju vanjskog vrednovanja situacija nije toliko jednoznačna, budući da različita međunarodna ispitivanja znanja, sposobnosti i vještina ukazuju da dječaci postižu više rezultate na standardiziranim ispitivanjima iz područja matematike, dok djevojčice postižu bolje obrazovne rezultate u ispitivanjima čitanja i jezika (Baker i Jones, 1993.;Beller i Gafni, 1996.;Galagher i Kaufman, 2005.;Marks, 2007. Rezultati meta analiza istraživanja spolnih razlika u standardiziranim provjerama znanja ukazuju da su razlike u obrazovnim postignućima na standardiziranim provjerama znanja i vještina relativno stabilne u razdoblju od 1960-ih do 1990-ih (Hedges i Nowell, 1995.).…”
Section: Spolne Razlike U Obrazovnom Postignućuunclassified