2005
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200400781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Does Pivalaldehyde (Trimethylacetaldehyde) Unexpectedly Seem More Basic Than 1‐Adamantanecarbaldehyde in the Gas Phase? FT‐ICR and High‐Level Ab Initio Studies

Abstract: Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance spectroscopy (FT ICR) techniques, including collision-induced dissociation (CID) methodology, were applied to the study of the gas-phase protonation of pivalaldehyde (1) and 1-adamantanecarbaldehyde (2). A new synthetic method for 2 was developed. The experiments, together with a thorough computational study involving ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) calculations of high level, conclusively show that upon monoprotonation in the gas phase, compound 1 yields… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be underlined at this stage that several of the proton affinity values presented in Scheme are deduced from a correlation with ionization energies (Benoit & Harrison, , Bouchoux, ). An interesting case is that of 2,2‐dimethyl propanal (pivalaldehyde, 1 ) for which we deduce, from this correlation, a PA value of 806 kJ/mol (Scheme ) while an experimental value, recently obtained from bracketing experiments in a FT‐ICR mass spectrometer, was PA = 832 ± 5 kJ/mol (Quintanilla et al, ). This surprisingly high PA value has been interpreted by a facile isomerization of protonated pivaladehyde, 1H + , to protonated methyl‐isopropyl ketone, 2H + , via a pinacolic type rearrangement involving a combination of 1,2‐methide and 1,2‐hydride shifts (Scheme ).…”
Section: Aldehydes and Ketonessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be underlined at this stage that several of the proton affinity values presented in Scheme are deduced from a correlation with ionization energies (Benoit & Harrison, , Bouchoux, ). An interesting case is that of 2,2‐dimethyl propanal (pivalaldehyde, 1 ) for which we deduce, from this correlation, a PA value of 806 kJ/mol (Scheme ) while an experimental value, recently obtained from bracketing experiments in a FT‐ICR mass spectrometer, was PA = 832 ± 5 kJ/mol (Quintanilla et al, ). This surprisingly high PA value has been interpreted by a facile isomerization of protonated pivaladehyde, 1H + , to protonated methyl‐isopropyl ketone, 2H + , via a pinacolic type rearrangement involving a combination of 1,2‐methide and 1,2‐hydride shifts (Scheme ).…”
Section: Aldehydes and Ketonessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…More insidiously such reactions may occur inside proton transfer complexes and thus perturb gas‐phase basicity determination. Several examples of such behavior were identified for ketones (Quintanilla et al, ), diketones (Akrour et al, ) and substituted aromatic ketones or acid derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism proposed to explain the formation of [MHH 2 O] + implies a transfer of the methyl group from C13 to C17, as presented in the upper part of Scheme . Such a 1,2‐transfer of a methyl anion to an adjacent positively charged carbon atom has been previously reported 22. The second hydrogen atom of the eliminated water molecule could come either from the methyl group on C17, through a four‐center concerted mechanism leading to the ion (b) in Scheme , or from the C14 position after the migration of a hydrogen atom from C14 to C13 via a four‐center concerted mechanism, leading to the ion (a) in Scheme .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The activation barrier, estimated at the G3B3 level, is 60 kJ mol −1 . As previously suggested,17, 18 one may reasonably guess that this energy is provided by the strong interactions (hydrogen bonds and ion–dipole) that, under normal experimental conditions, occur between the neutral and deprotonated bases. These interaction energies are typically15 between 70 and 125 kJ mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%