2017
DOI: 10.4172/2572-4126.1000114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Don’t Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Work in Colorectal Cancer?

Abstract: In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective in treating manifold types of cancer but less robust in colorectal cancer (CRC). While, the subgroup of CRC with microsatellite instability (MSI; also termed as mismatch repair deficient) showed a moderate response to Pembrolizumab in a single arm phase II clinical trial, microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers were unresponsive. Possible mechanisms that affect immune response in colorectal cancer will be reviewed in this article. We wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…improved prognosis associated with an increased inflammatory infiltrate in CRC as defined by the Immunoscore(106,107). The limited efficacy of anti-PD1 in CRC may be explained by the immune evasion stage of Immunoediting(108). One function of anti-PD1 is to increase the effector functions of T cells, but if the tumour cells develop mechanisms to evade the immune response then the T cells would be unable to recognise the tumour and exert these effector functions(108).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…improved prognosis associated with an increased inflammatory infiltrate in CRC as defined by the Immunoscore(106,107). The limited efficacy of anti-PD1 in CRC may be explained by the immune evasion stage of Immunoediting(108). One function of anti-PD1 is to increase the effector functions of T cells, but if the tumour cells develop mechanisms to evade the immune response then the T cells would be unable to recognise the tumour and exert these effector functions(108).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited efficacy of anti-PD1 in CRC may be explained by the immune evasion stage of Immunoediting(108). One function of anti-PD1 is to increase the effector functions of T cells, but if the tumour cells develop mechanisms to evade the immune response then the T cells would be unable to recognise the tumour and exert these effector functions(108). Alternatively, due to the heterogeneity of pathogenesis observed in CRC, other routes to tumourogenesis may out-compete the actions of anti-PD1.The gut harbours a unique combination of different cell types, which may account for why PD-1 blockade is unsuccessful in most CRC cases but successful in other cancer types (nonsmall cell lung cancer) (109).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%