2011
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why FCC riser is taller than model predictions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to the complexity of the riser's feed which is a complex mixture of extremely large number of unknown compounds. Also, there is the complex hydrodynamics of the riser owing to the three phases (solid, liquid and gas) nature along with gas phase volume expansion due to vaporization and cracking reaction (Kumar and Reddy, 2011). The challenge with the cracking reaction is its characterization.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelling and Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the complexity of the riser's feed which is a complex mixture of extremely large number of unknown compounds. Also, there is the complex hydrodynamics of the riser owing to the three phases (solid, liquid and gas) nature along with gas phase volume expansion due to vaporization and cracking reaction (Kumar and Reddy, 2011). The challenge with the cracking reaction is its characterization.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelling and Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the rise, the increase in conversion becomes sluggish in the dilute‐phase zone. As discussed by Kumar and Reddy, fitting Derouin et al's data is a nontrivial task. Figure shows that the three models predict very different product yields (wt %) and the concentrations of unconverted VGO.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%