2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3572400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Fixed Costs Matter for Proof-of-Work Based Cryptocurrencies

Abstract: Bank of Canada staff working papers provide a forum for staff to publish work-in-progress research independently from the Bank's Governing Council. This research may support or challenge prevailing policy orthodoxy. Therefore, the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and may differ from official Bank of Canada views. No responsibility for them should be attributed to the Bank.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gervais et al (2016) present a dynamic analysis of the costs and benefits of various attack vectors. Garatt and van Oordt (2020) examine the role of fixed cost of capital formation for the security of Proof-of-Work Based Cryptocurrencies, Böhme et al (2015) and Schilling and Uhlig (2019) present discussions of broader economic implications and governance issues, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gervais et al (2016) present a dynamic analysis of the costs and benefits of various attack vectors. Garatt and van Oordt (2020) examine the role of fixed cost of capital formation for the security of Proof-of-Work Based Cryptocurrencies, Böhme et al (2015) and Schilling and Uhlig (2019) present discussions of broader economic implications and governance issues, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gervais et al (2016) present a dynamic analysis of the costs and benefits of various attack vectors. Garatt and van Oordt (2020) examine the role of fixed cost of capital formation for the security of Proof-of-Work Based Cryptocurrencies, Böhme et al (2015) and Schilling and Uhlig (2019) present discussions of broader economic implications and governance issues, respectively. Leshno and Strack (2020) present a generalization of such analysis, demonstrating that no other anonymous and proof-of-work-based cyrptocurrencies can improve upon the performance of Bitcoin.…”
Section: Preview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That taxonomy divides characteristic into the classes costs, security, and convenience, with the possibility to add other categories for things such as payment amounts. We decided to include "transaction costs" as the sole characteristic for costs, as fixed costs do not really factor into cryptocurrency usage, and are only really discussed in the context of mining [25]. In the category security we consider "confidentiality" with the possible instances low, medium, or high, as well as "anonymity" with given or not given.…”
Section: Morphological Tablementioning
confidence: 99%