Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study

Abstract

Objectives To explore the reasons why general practitioners do not always implement best evidence. Design Qualitative study using Balint-style groups. Setting Primary care. Participants 19 general practitioners. Main outcome measures Identifiable themes that indicate barriers to implementation.Results Six main themes were identified that affected the implementation process: the personal and professional experiences of the general practitioners; the patient-doctor relationship; a perceived tension between primary and secondary care; general practitioners' feelings about their patients and the evidence; and logistical problems. Doctors are aware that their choice of words with patients can affect patients' decisions and whether evidence is implemented. Conclusions General practitioner participants seem to act as a conduit within the consultation and regard clinical evidence as a square peg to fit in the round hole of the patient's life. The process of implementation is complex, fluid, and adaptive.

The two-week wait cancer initiative on oral cancer; the predictive value of urgent referrals to an oral medicine unit

“…The data should be viewed under the context that doctors and dentists are working with patients and for the benefi t of their patients, and strictly sticking to referral guidelines may not be appropriate. 6 From Table 1 it can be seen that the common reasons for referral to our oral medicine unit for urgent cases was a persistent ulcer or swelling or a red or red and white patch. All of the patients diagnosed with a cancer were found to have at least one or more of these three presenting features.…”

General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars

“…6 Some of the GDPs felt that the BSPD guidelines were out of touch with the realities of daily general dental practice and that the guidance was therefore inappropriate. The perception was that BSPD guidelines were written by a group of hospital specialists who were unaccustomed with the time pressures encountered in a busy general practice.…”

A matter of heart: the general practitioner consultation in an evidence-based world

“…Several studies indicate that general practitioners show limited adherence to clinical guidelines (46,47). Organ experts tend to indicate that the reason may be either ignorance or paternalism among GPs and consider it a violation of patient autonomy not to offer state-of-the-art medical intervention.…”