Why Georgia, Why? Peach State Residents’ Perceptions of Voting‐Related Improprieties and Their Impact on the 2018 Gubernatorial Election

Abstract

Objective In the historic 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election, which for the first time featured a black Democratic woman against a white Republican man, we assess opinions toward voting‐related concerns and their impact on voters’ preferences. Methods We surveyed political behavior with a representative sample of likely Georgia voters to gauge their perceptions of voting‐related improprieties and their possible effect on vote choice. Results Our analysis makes it clear that not only did voters divide over election‐related concerns, which dominated the narrative of the gubernatorial contest, but opinions on this matter strongly influenced the choice for governor. Conclusions Reflecting a national development, but amplified in Georgia because demographic changes and growing minority participation are increasing competition, election administration has become highly politicized and it was the focal point of the 2018 gubernatorial campaign and the principal short‐term factor shaping mass voting behavior.

Partisan schism in America’s newest swing state

“…Abrams lost the election with 49.3% of the two-party vote and never officially conceded. Survey data on the 2018 gubernatorial election revealed strong divisions over whether the election was fair, with those not trusting Republicans' oversight of election administration significantly more likely to vote for the Democrat Abrams (Hood and McKee, 2019).…”

Dueling incumbent primaries in U.S. House elections

“…With their newly won trifecta after 2004, Georgia Republicans redrew the congressional map for the 2006 midterms, but they were not nearly as ruthless as Texas Republicans were(McKee and Shaw 2005), in targeting Democrats for electoral defeat(Hood and McKee 2009). As most of the Deep South (Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina) has become more Republican since the 1990s (McKee and Springer 2015), Georgia is a Deep South state that of late has tilted in a more competitive direction, as witnessed by the extremely contentious 2018 gubernatorial contest(Hood and McKee 2019), the post-2020 election fallout stoked by then and now former President Trump's claim that the presidential election was stolen, the controversy surrounding an overhaul of its election administration with passage of Senate Bill 202 in 2021(Hood and McKee 2022a), and the highly competitive 2022 Senate runoff won by the Democratic incumbent Raphael Warnock. In 2022, Georgia Republicans controlled redistricting and were able to pit two congressional Democratic incumbents against each other in the District 7 primary contest(Hood and McKee 2022b).10 For example, preserving communities of interest, not splitting county boundaries, promoting compactness, or not favoring incumbents(Edwards et al 2016(Edwards et al , 2017 Particularly in the North, not the South (see Rodden 2019).12 Lending credence to this claim is that, in the small number of dueling incumbent primaries taking place when states gained seats (N = 4), these were all Republican-versus-Republican contests (CA-33 in 1982, GA-7 in 2002, AZ-6 in 2012, and FL-7 in 2012).…”

How Much Is a Trump Endorsement Worth?

“…The Brian Kemp versus Stacey Abrams 2018 gubernatorial general election in Georgia made national news, was highly competitive, and was controversial because Kemp refused to step down from his position as secretary of state. Beyond obvious conflict-of-interest issues, Democrats (with Abrams leading the charge) accused Kemp of suppressing minority participation in the 2018 midterm election (seeHood and McKee 2019).…”