Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study

Abstract

BackgroundClinical practice variation that results in poor patient outcomes remains a pressing problem for health care organizations. Some evidence suggests that a key factor may be ineffective internal and professional networks that limit knowledge exchange among health care professionals. Virtual communities have the potential to overcome professional and organizational barriers and facilitate knowledge flow.ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore why health care professionals belong to an exemplar virtual community, ICUConnect. The specific research objectives were to (1) understand why members join a virtual community and remain a member, (2) identify what purpose the virtual community serves in their professional lives, (3) identify how a member uses the virtual community, and (4) identify how members used the knowledge or resources shared on the virtual community.MethodsA qualitative design, underpinned by pragmatism, was used to collect data from 3 asynchronous online focus groups and 4 key informant interviews, with participants allocated to a group based on their posting behaviors during the previous two years—between September 1, 2012, and August 31, 2014: (1) frequent (>5 times), (2) low (≤5 times), and (3) nonposters. A novel approach to focus group moderation, based on the principles of traditional focus groups, and e-moderating was developed. Thematic analysis was undertaken, applying the Diffusion of Innovation theory as the theoretical lens. NCapture (QRS International) was used to extract data from the focus groups, and NVivo was used to manage all data. A research diary and audit trail were maintained.ResultsThere were 27 participants: 7 frequent posters, 13 low posters, and 7 nonposters. All participants displayed an external orientation, with the majority using other social media; however, listservs were perceived to be superior in terms of professional compatibility and complexity. The main theme was as follows: “Intensive care professionals are members of ICUConnect because by being a member of a broader community they have access to credible best-practice knowledge.” The virtual community facilitated access to all professionals caring for the critically ill and was characterized by a positive and collegial online culture. The knowledge found was credible because it was extensive and because the virtual community was moderated and sponsored by a government agency. This enabled members to benchmark and improve their unit practices and keep up to date.ConclusionsThis group of health care professionals made a strategic decision to be members of ICUConnect, as they understood that to provide up-to-date clinical practices, they needed to network with colleagues in other facilities. This demonstrated that a closed specialty-specific virtual community can create a broad heterogeneous professional network, overcoming current ineffective networks that may adversely impact knowledge exchange and creation in local practice settings. To address clinical practice variation, health care organizations can leve...

A Literature Review of Studies that Have Compared the Use of Face-To-Face and Online Focus Groups

“…Explanations for observed differences in levels of interaction in online groups may inform choice of format. Murgado-Armenteros (2012) and Rolls (2019) report that there can be difficulties in achieving interaction and cohesion between participants in online synchronous focus groups, and Greenbaum (2000) and Genoe (2018) argue the lack of non-verbal cues and difficulties establishing a presence behind the computer screen can compound the problem. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that text-based synchronous and asynchronous focus groups can in some instances provide levels of interaction comparable to face-to-face groups (Gordon et al, 2021; Reisner et al, 2018; Skelton et al, 2018; Walsh et al, 2009; Woodyatt et al, 2016).…”

Physician leaders’ cross-boundary use of social media: what are the implications in the current COVID-19 environment?

“…Recent studies have described strategic actions by health-care professionals to become members of specific networking initiatives such as ICUConnect because they need to network with colleagues in other facilities to remain up to date on clinical practices and Use of social media related topics (Rolls et al, 2019). However, Schot et al (2020) notes that more is needed to understand the contributions, roles and collaborative settings between different health professions from a theoretical, methodological and empirical perspective.…”

Using Asynchronous Online Focus Groups to Capture Healthcare Professional Opinions

“…There is growing literature describing the experiences of implementing AOFGs among HCPs (Ferrante et al, 2016; K. L. Matthews et al, 2018; Tuttas, 2015; Wilkerson et al, 2014; Williams et al, 2012). AOFGs have been used to learn about professional views on end-of-life communication (Oosterveld-Vlug et al, 2017), online communities (Rolls et al, 2019), experiences of nurses seeking employment (Hancock et al, 2016), experiences implementing Medicaid policies (Gray et al, 2021), pharmacists’ role in opioid safety (Hartung et al, 2018), clinician perspectives on prescription drug monitoring programs (Hildebran et al, 2014), and virtual reality-based learning (Miller et al, 2018).…”