2021
DOI: 10.1002/wps.20815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why hierarchical dimensional approaches to classification will fail to transform diagnosis in psychiatry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Features of NMD have long been recognized as transdiagnostic in nature as reviewed. Regardless, the DSM and measures based on categorical DSM disorders likely will continue to serve as the standard for many research areas and clinical practice for the foreseeable future (Zimmerman, 2021). Therefore, in addition to discussing transdiagnostic perspectives on NMD, we provide ideas for optimally studying and assessing NMD features within a categorical DSM framework.…”
Section: Expanded Construct Definitions and Issues Concerning Discrim...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features of NMD have long been recognized as transdiagnostic in nature as reviewed. Regardless, the DSM and measures based on categorical DSM disorders likely will continue to serve as the standard for many research areas and clinical practice for the foreseeable future (Zimmerman, 2021). Therefore, in addition to discussing transdiagnostic perspectives on NMD, we provide ideas for optimally studying and assessing NMD features within a categorical DSM framework.…”
Section: Expanded Construct Definitions and Issues Concerning Discrim...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research evidence that demonstrated that patient evaluated using a dimensional approach improves with treatment is lacking. Replacing the categorical DSM-5/ICD-11 classification system with a dimensional one appears not feasible if clinical outcomes are not demonstrably better [10].…”
Section: The Limitations Of Personalized Medicine In Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the CDDR, to which WPA experts have extensively contributed (including through chairmanship of several Workgroups), is regarded as the most broadly international and participative pro­­cess ever implemented for a classification of mental disorders 1 . The main differences between the CDDR and the DSM‐5 diagnostic criteria, and the main contentious issues that have been debated in the development of the CDDR, have been extensively dealt with in this journal 2‐13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%