1988
DOI: 10.3354/meps042033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is Acartia tonsa (Copepoda: Calanoida) restricted to nearshore environments?

Abstract: The copepod Acartia tonsa is adapted to high food concentrations which it encounters in estuaries and upwelled waters. It cannot obtain sufficient food for reproduction on the middle and outer shelf, where food concentrations are usually low, because it decreases clearance rates when concentrations of Thalassiosira weissflogii fall below 0.25 mm3 1-' In comparison, the offshore copepod Paracalanus sp. continues to increase its clearance rate when food levels are below the abovementioned concentration. Several … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
81
0
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
81
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study demonstrates that a lower feeding threshold exists in Acartia hudsonica, consistent with earlier reports of reduced clearance and ingestion rates in other copepod species at low food abundance (Frost 1975, Ki~rboe et al 1985a, Paffenhofer & Stearns 1988, and direct observations of reduced swimming and feeding activity in copepods when food was absent or of low abundance [Piontkovskii & Petipa 1976(cited in Paffenhofer & Stearns 1988), Cowles & Strickler 1983, Price & Paffenhofer 1986, Gill & Poulet 1988. Although a lower feeding threshold may be a widespread phenomenon, the response over the same food concentration range differs markedly among copepod species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study demonstrates that a lower feeding threshold exists in Acartia hudsonica, consistent with earlier reports of reduced clearance and ingestion rates in other copepod species at low food abundance (Frost 1975, Ki~rboe et al 1985a, Paffenhofer & Stearns 1988, and direct observations of reduced swimming and feeding activity in copepods when food was absent or of low abundance [Piontkovskii & Petipa 1976(cited in Paffenhofer & Stearns 1988), Cowles & Strickler 1983, Price & Paffenhofer 1986, Gill & Poulet 1988. Although a lower feeding threshold may be a widespread phenomenon, the response over the same food concentration range differs markedly among copepod species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For example, as food concentration declined below 0.22 pg C I-', the clearance rate in Eucalanus pileatus and Paracalanus sp. increased, whereas that in A. tonsa sharply declined (Paffenhofer & Stearns 1988). Thus there will be no single absolute feeding threshold that is generally applicable to different copepod species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acartia spp. tend to reduce their clearance rates for algae below some threshold food abundance (Deason 1980, Kerboe et al 1985, Paffenhofer & Stearns 1988, Durbin & Durbin 1992, Kierboe et al 1996. For diatoms, the clearance rate decreases when the abundance is below -100 to 500 cells ml-l, or -4 to 40 pg C 1-l. For smaller flagellates the level where clearance rate starts to decrease seems to be higher (Kerboe et al 1985: maximum clearance rate at 150 1-19 C 1-' for Rhodomonas baltica; Gismervik unpubl.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…results: maximum clearance rate at about 5000 cells ml-' for Tetraselmis damir). According to Paffenhofer & Stearns (1988) the decrease in clearance rate in A. tonsa at low algal food concentrations may be due to few chemoreceptors, and a n inability to change the flow field in order to re-route cells that are displaced towards the copepod. Thus, this initial increase in clearance rates for algae found by some investigators is generated by switching from non-feeding to feeding activities (Marten 1973).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation