1997
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/10.4.1203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Is Bank Debt Senior? A Theory of Asymmetry and Claim Priority Based on Influence Costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
92
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
92
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elsas and Khranen (2000) justify their result with the argument made by Welch (1997) and Longhofer and Santos (2000), who show that it is optimal for bank debt to be more senior when lending relationships are stronger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Elsas and Khranen (2000) justify their result with the argument made by Welch (1997) and Longhofer and Santos (2000), who show that it is optimal for bank debt to be more senior when lending relationships are stronger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…4 A related group of papers explains why bank debt is usually senior, even though junior creditors should have greater incentives for monitoring. Welch (1997) shows that because of their strength and organization, banks are in a better position to contest bankruptcy plans that they do not like. When they are senior creditors, this deters the junior creditors from contesting the plan.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model is simpler than previous models in several ways; however, it adds a very important feature to the analysis, namely, as in Welch (1997) we allow for violations of the absolute priority rule (APR) in bankruptcy. The conflict that is introduced between debt holders of different priorities has an effect on the proceeds from financing at different seniority levels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, these studies find that dual holding can benefit firms by promoting their access to bank capital and improving their performance (Kang et al, 2000;Mahrt-Smith, 2006;Jiang et al, 2010). Meanwhile, another strand of studies focuses on the harmful effects of dual holding, arguing that it leads to potentially more serious conflicts of interest (Diamond, 1984;Welch, 1997). Empirical evidence suggests that, although dual holdings allow firms in emerging markets to have better access to debt financing, banks do not monitor these firms quite so extensively, which may result in poorer firm performance Luo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%