2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is it a man’s world, after all? Women on bank boards in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory is typically linked to the conflict of interest result from the ownership separation (Fama & Jensen, 1983; Jensen & Meckling, 1976). The board diversity literature used it to explore topics such as board diversity influence on the agency conflict and performance of financial firms (Bektas & Kaymak, 2009; Boadi & Osarfo, 2019; Farag & Mallin, 2017; Ghosh, 2017; Kaymak & Bektas, 2008; Kusi, Gyeke‐Dako, Agbloyor, & Darku, 2018; Shettima & Dzolkarnaini, 2018; Talavera, Yin, & Zhang, 2018), CSR reporting quality of financial sector (Tapver, Laidroo, & Gurvitš‐Suits, 2020), CSR practices (Isabel María García‐Sánchez, Martínez‐Ferrero, & García‐Meca, 2018), environmental, social, and governance performance (Birindelli, Dell'Atti, Iannuzzi, & Savioli, 2018), mergers and acquisition performance (Chu, Teng, & Lee, 2016; Hagendorff et al, 2007; Hagendorff & Keasey, 2012), risk taking (Abou‐El‐Sood, 2019; De Vita & Luo, 2018; Yu et al, 2017), compensation policy (García‐Meca, 2016), audit fees (Nehme & Jizi, 2018), earnings management (Fan, Jiang, Zhang, & Zhou, 2019), determinants of banks' bailouts (Fernandes, Farinha, Martins, & Mateus, 2016), and banks' efficiency (Ramly, Chan, Mustapha, & Sapiei, 2017). It is noteworthy that the agency argument helps us to understand the supervisory role of the board members to monitor and control management activities, whereas multiple theoretical perspectives enable us to better interpret the other roles of the board of directors.…”
Section: Slr Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This theory is typically linked to the conflict of interest result from the ownership separation (Fama & Jensen, 1983; Jensen & Meckling, 1976). The board diversity literature used it to explore topics such as board diversity influence on the agency conflict and performance of financial firms (Bektas & Kaymak, 2009; Boadi & Osarfo, 2019; Farag & Mallin, 2017; Ghosh, 2017; Kaymak & Bektas, 2008; Kusi, Gyeke‐Dako, Agbloyor, & Darku, 2018; Shettima & Dzolkarnaini, 2018; Talavera, Yin, & Zhang, 2018), CSR reporting quality of financial sector (Tapver, Laidroo, & Gurvitš‐Suits, 2020), CSR practices (Isabel María García‐Sánchez, Martínez‐Ferrero, & García‐Meca, 2018), environmental, social, and governance performance (Birindelli, Dell'Atti, Iannuzzi, & Savioli, 2018), mergers and acquisition performance (Chu, Teng, & Lee, 2016; Hagendorff et al, 2007; Hagendorff & Keasey, 2012), risk taking (Abou‐El‐Sood, 2019; De Vita & Luo, 2018; Yu et al, 2017), compensation policy (García‐Meca, 2016), audit fees (Nehme & Jizi, 2018), earnings management (Fan, Jiang, Zhang, & Zhou, 2019), determinants of banks' bailouts (Fernandes, Farinha, Martins, & Mateus, 2016), and banks' efficiency (Ramly, Chan, Mustapha, & Sapiei, 2017). It is noteworthy that the agency argument helps us to understand the supervisory role of the board members to monitor and control management activities, whereas multiple theoretical perspectives enable us to better interpret the other roles of the board of directors.…”
Section: Slr Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an industry as heavily regulated and opaque as banking industry (Kaymak & Bektas, 2008), knowledge is a vital form of business capital, and financial companies' improvement involves a variety of perspective, experience, and insights that can be acquired by board diversity (Khatib et al, 2020; Onuorah, Osuji, & Ozurumba, 2019). The resource dependence theory has been applied in 17 quantitative studies that discuss several topics related to board diversity such as bank performance (Boadi & Osarfo, 2019; Farag & Mallin, 2017; Ghosh, 2017; Talavera et al, 2018), compensation policy (García‐Meca, 2016), CSR (Orazalin, 2019), bank efficiency (Adeabah, Gyeke‐Dako, & Andoh, 2019) (Ramly et al, 2017), earnings management (Fan et al, 2019), and accounting quality (García‐Sánchez, Martínez‐Ferrero, & García‐Meca, 2017).…”
Section: Slr Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors did not find any impact of corporate governance mechanisms on total factor productivity in Indian banks. Ghosh () investigated the impact of gender diversity in banks boards on Indian banks performance and stability. The findings of this study show that gender diversity does not impact bank performance and stability.…”
Section: Board Governance and Performance In Indian Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their research, (Adams & Ferreira, 2009) argues that board that has diversity in gender would have a better monitoring and better performance. Those findings were supported by (Ghosh, 2016) that argues that woman in the boardroom would increase the stability of the bank in India. On another study, gender diversity believed could lead to an increase in firms' portfolio risk (Berger et al, 2014).…”
Section: Board Diversitymentioning
confidence: 77%