2015
DOI: 10.1038/nrd4725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is it hard to terminate failing projects in pharmaceutical R&D?

Abstract: 'Quick-kill' strategies in pharmaceutical research and development aim to reduce late-stage attrition by bringing project termination decisions forward, to an earlier point in the process. How can the barriers to implementing such strategies be overcome?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some reported models focus on use of non-clinical or translational data to improve predictions of safety (Bowes et al, 2012) or efficacy (Dolgos et al, 2016). Others focus on target-centric approaches, particularly for new biological entities (Swinney and Anthony, 2011), more rapid paths to clinical proof-of-concept (Owens et al, 2015), or attempts to identify candidates for early termination, i.e., before the most expensive late-stage clinical development starts (Peck et al, 2015), or more systematic portfolio review to systematically challenge development candidates (Cook et al, 2014). Of note, risk mitigation is not only an important topic for the pharmaceutical industry but also in academic drug discovery (Dahlin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reported models focus on use of non-clinical or translational data to improve predictions of safety (Bowes et al, 2012) or efficacy (Dolgos et al, 2016). Others focus on target-centric approaches, particularly for new biological entities (Swinney and Anthony, 2011), more rapid paths to clinical proof-of-concept (Owens et al, 2015), or attempts to identify candidates for early termination, i.e., before the most expensive late-stage clinical development starts (Peck et al, 2015), or more systematic portfolio review to systematically challenge development candidates (Cook et al, 2014). Of note, risk mitigation is not only an important topic for the pharmaceutical industry but also in academic drug discovery (Dahlin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we argue that the termination of innovation projects (although the projects themselves can be considered as failures) is a laudable management practice and an effective detection of such failures is necessary to avoid waste of time and high costs in continuing projects. Thus, firms can prevent overspending on innovation, which the literature found to be correlated with innovation project termination [6], [17]- [19]. In sum, this paper advocates for termination of a project as a valuable learning opportunity and a proper way of handling less promising innovation projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In a recent article, Richard Peck et al . made a strong case that promoting “truth‐seeking” rather than “progression‐seeking” behavior would increase R&D success by learning more in early clinical development. Peck et al .…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%