2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is it hard to identify the onset of chatter? A stochastic resonance perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the stability limit is detected by interval halving, which leads to a significant decrease in the number of measurement points. This method is applicable even in the presence of measurement noise because it does not rely on derivatives [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the stability limit is detected by interval halving, which leads to a significant decrease in the number of measurement points. This method is applicable even in the presence of measurement noise because it does not rely on derivatives [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emulated turning process is said to be unstable when the amplitude of the arising oscillations, that is, the subtraction of the workpiece response signal and the run-out of the workpiece, reaches the level of 3 μm (see the upper panel of Fig. 2) at the chatter frequency, which is detected to be around the dominant natural frequency f n = 3.05 kHz of the setup (see [11,19]). This way, the effective experimental identification of the stability boundary of the cutting process is carried out according to two different techniques: the brute force method and the bisection method detailed in Section 4.…”
Section: Experimental Chatter Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in real turning measurements chatter detection is challenging in machining [9]. On one hand, when the process is unstable the exponentially increasing amplitude saturates at some point due to nonlinear effects (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are very sophisticated FEM-based models to describe these behaviors [13,14], that include chip fragmentation and material inhomogeneities but these are complicated, computationally very demanding, and hard to validate. Another way of explaining the increasing variance is using stochastic cutting force models [15], because it properly predicts stochastic resonance characteristics, unlike deterministic models [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%