2019
DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2018.1558723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is Sharikov dead? The fate of “the Soviet Frankenstein” in Bulgakov’sA Dog’s Heart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bulgakov's novellas serve as fertile ground for posthumanist notions of hybridity, paradoxically aligning them with the transformative optimism of the time. Whereas their radical treatment of animality has been explored elsewhere (Fudge 2009;Mortensen 2016;Dame 2019), the current article discusses the other end of the spectrum of Bulgakov's posthumanism, i.e. the mechanical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulgakov's novellas serve as fertile ground for posthumanist notions of hybridity, paradoxically aligning them with the transformative optimism of the time. Whereas their radical treatment of animality has been explored elsewhere (Fudge 2009;Mortensen 2016;Dame 2019), the current article discusses the other end of the spectrum of Bulgakov's posthumanism, i.e. the mechanical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%